In August of 2008, The Informed East Vincent Residents Group (IEVR) was formed. We, as a group of residents from both sides of the PECO power lines, came together out of concern about a proposed zoning amendment. This proposed amendment would have impacted our entire East Vincent Township community in many respects. Some IEVR members provided computer expertise, some used their human resource experience to pull the wording of the blog together, some provided insight into possible legal issues and others attended meetings.
Initially, many of us would do what we could to attend all the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors' meetings. We would do our best to hold our appointed and elected officials to their promise of an open and transparent government. There were times when discussions between IEVR members and an appointed or elected official would get "heated." Still, even amongst threats of being thrown out of meetings and threatened with jail time; we remained committed to attending the meetings to assure transparency for the residents. Because I had the time available, and an understanding family willing to allow me to do that which was necessary, I became the resident responsible for attending all the meetings and sharing the the information about the meetings, on the blog.
As I attend the meetings, I've come to learn much lies ahead when it comes to future planning for our township. Therefore, I put in an application to be on our township's Planning Commission and I will begin to serve on the commission this month. The next Planning Commission meeting is Tuesday, March 16, 2010 at 7:00 p.m.
As a result of my appointment to the Planning Commission, our blog will no longer be active. The reason for this is because we believe it is unethical for an appointed or an elected official to maintain a blog. We believe it is unethical for an appointed or an elected official to utilize a blog, etc. for the purpose of sharing their own personal opinions and viewpoints about any issue which may be arising in the township. We feel that as an appointed or an elected official, one should be an impartial member of that committee/board, gather all information necessary to make an educated and informed decision--- in the best interest of the township, and only then share an opinion during the public format of the public meetings.
You can continue to remain informed about what is happening at the meetings by going to http://www.eastvincent.org/ . On the right side of the page, scroll down until you see "Minutes." Scroll down again until you see "read more." Click on "read more" and you will be able to listen to the audio of the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors' meetings once they are posted. You can also find meeting times on this site and on the announcement board outside of the township building.
At the request of our Environmental Advisory Council, we leave you with one final announcement about an upcoming township workshop:
"East Vincent Township is offering a free workshop for township residents who are interested in learning more about geothermal energy (or ground source heat pumps). It will be held at the East Vincent Townhip Municipal building on Saturday, March 27, 2010 @ 9:00 a.m. Attendees will learn more about these energy efficient systems and what it takes to put one in your home."
Thank you again for your support and continue have a nice day!
Jane Peronteau and the Informed East Vincent Residents Group.
Saturday, March 13, 2010
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
East Vincent Township Board of Supervisors' Meeting, March 3, 2010
The East Vincent Township Board of Supervisors' Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, March 3, 2010, in the East Vincent Township Municipal Building located at 262 Ridge Road.
Please go to www.eastvincent.org to view the current agenda for this meeting.
Please go to www.eastvincent.org to view the current agenda for this meeting.
Monday, February 1, 2010
East Vincent Township Board of Supervisors' Meeting, Wednesday, February 3, 2010
The East Vincent Township Board of Supervisors' Meeting is scheduled for this Wednesday, February 3 at 7:30 P.M., in the East Vincent Township Municipal building located at 262 Ridge Road.
To view the current agenda for this meeting, please use the following link: http://www.eastvincent.org/
Once there, click on "Current Agenda" for the Board of Supervisors.
Thank you,
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
To view the current agenda for this meeting, please use the following link: http://www.eastvincent.org/
Once there, click on "Current Agenda" for the Board of Supervisors.
Thank you,
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
Thursday, January 21, 2010
Update: East Vincent Planning Commission Meeting, January 19, 2010
Discussion last evening revolved largely around possible zoning changes. This discussion came about as a result of the workshop meeting between the Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission which was held on December 14, 2009. The possibility of swapping the PO/GI (professional office and light industrial) districts to the Pennhurst Property, and moving the LR (light residential) district to the Jones Motor location, was initially suggested at this workshop meeting.
Ryan Costello, attorney for the Pennhurst Property owner, spoke to the Planning Commission (PC) about rezoning the Route 724 Corridor. He was requesting input and opinions from the PC about a possible rezoning; swapping the PO/GI district at Jones Motor, with the LR district of the Pennhurst site. Mr. Costello read the PO/GI ordinances and mentioned different uses allowed in this zoning. PC member Dr. Schwartz acknowledged that the "PO/GI district is a 'white elephant' due to it's size and is the largest of all the municipalities in the [Phoenixville Planning] region." He mentioned that "we [East Vincent Township] don't have to have a place for all of these uses," [PO/GI district]. Mr. Costello reminded the PC that the Phoenixville Regional Plan saw the PO/GI district in East Vincent Township as an incentive EVT had for the [Phoenixville] region. Dr. Schwartz would like to see mixed-use development at the Pennhurst site instead. He would like to see the light rail line come through as a means of transportation to and from the Pennhurst site. Dr. Schwartz commented that mixed-use development is very high in traffic and he didn't see the Jones Motor property and its surrounding roads capable of handling the traffic of a mixed-used development. Mr. Costello mentioned a cargo rail line that is in the Pennhurst area which could also be used to transport cargo to and from the Pennhurst site, therefore easing traffic concerns of a PO/GI use.
Mr. Costello suggested that if EVT were to allow for mixed-use on the Jones Motor site, the lands closer to West Bridge Street and Stoney Run Road could remain open space or used for farming---which would maintain the rural character of that area. If the zoning were to remain "as is", the Windgates and surrounding homes may eventually look out and see industrial use directly across from their developments. "A live, work and play" use at Jones Motor is the idea Mr. Costello was expressing.
Chairperson Adams commented that she would like to see Pennhurst as a mixed-use development and also suggested reducing the PO/GI tract along the Rt. 724 Corridor. Chairperson Adams would like to see an "Eagleview" type of development at the Pennhurst site. Mrs. Milito agreed with Chairperson Adams and Dr. Schwartz. Mrs. Milito would like to see the reduction of the PO/GI district so it doesn't have to go to Pennhurst. Mr. Costello mentioned that the PO/GI can be reduced at Pennhurst also.
PC member Lawson MacCartney stated that "our colleagues in Spring City don't want traffic to Pennhurst." PC Member Todd Bereda said "we need good uses to get people to stop in Spring City. If there is a good use at Pennhurst, this will give people a reason to stop." Spring City Borough Council Member, Jim Burns, mentioned that he lives off Church Street (one of the access point to the Pennhurst site) and he doesn't want to see the traffic. Dr. Schwartz said "we need a creative way of traffic flow".
Supervisor McNeil mentioned the Community Design Collaborative grant for the Pennhurst site. Mr. Costello is going to find out more about this.
The Planning Commission will host a working meeting with Mr. Costello, his client and the Spring City Borough, to continue to review the Rt. 724 Corridor and the possibility of rezoning.
Another issue regarding an amendment to the Open Space Design Option (OSDO) was discussed. Planner Ray Ott provided a document to the PC suggesting the reduction of the multiplier in the AP/RC (agricultural preservation and rural conservation) districts. Mr. Ott was scheduled to present his information but did not attend the meeting. Dr. Schwartz suggested reducing the multipliers more than Mr. Ott considered, or to get rid of the OSDO completely. He mentioned that the Phoenixville Regional Plan calls for East Vincent Township to have less density (number of homes). PC Member Bereda asked if the density is reduced in the AP/RC districts, how will this affect the LR, MR and HR (light, medium and high residential) districts? Will these districts have to increase density? Vice-Chair Herron had the same concern. Mrs. Milito suggested making a motion to approve Mr. Ott's cover letter which provided documentation regarding the the reduction of the multipliers in the AP/RC district. The rest of the PC did not want to take action due to questions pertaining to the information on the inside of Mr. Ott's document.
An amendment to the Open Space Map was approved by the Planning Commission and allows for more open space south of the PECO power lines. This particular open space addition to the map is located south of Rt. 23. This amendment to the Open Space Map will go to the Board of Supervisors.
The Planning Commission has no objections to the proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance in the Borough of Phoenixville. This proposed ordinance allows for a multi-residential district (townhouses) on a reduced tract of 5 acres. This proposal will now move forward to the Board of Supervisors.
The Board of Supervisors' meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, February 3, 2010 at 7:30 p.m.
Please continue to contact us with any questions about issues or proposals affecting our township.
Thank you and have a nice day!
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
Ryan Costello, attorney for the Pennhurst Property owner, spoke to the Planning Commission (PC) about rezoning the Route 724 Corridor. He was requesting input and opinions from the PC about a possible rezoning; swapping the PO/GI district at Jones Motor, with the LR district of the Pennhurst site. Mr. Costello read the PO/GI ordinances and mentioned different uses allowed in this zoning. PC member Dr. Schwartz acknowledged that the "PO/GI district is a 'white elephant' due to it's size and is the largest of all the municipalities in the [Phoenixville Planning] region." He mentioned that "we [East Vincent Township] don't have to have a place for all of these uses," [PO/GI district]. Mr. Costello reminded the PC that the Phoenixville Regional Plan saw the PO/GI district in East Vincent Township as an incentive EVT had for the [Phoenixville] region. Dr. Schwartz would like to see mixed-use development at the Pennhurst site instead. He would like to see the light rail line come through as a means of transportation to and from the Pennhurst site. Dr. Schwartz commented that mixed-use development is very high in traffic and he didn't see the Jones Motor property and its surrounding roads capable of handling the traffic of a mixed-used development. Mr. Costello mentioned a cargo rail line that is in the Pennhurst area which could also be used to transport cargo to and from the Pennhurst site, therefore easing traffic concerns of a PO/GI use.
Mr. Costello suggested that if EVT were to allow for mixed-use on the Jones Motor site, the lands closer to West Bridge Street and Stoney Run Road could remain open space or used for farming---which would maintain the rural character of that area. If the zoning were to remain "as is", the Windgates and surrounding homes may eventually look out and see industrial use directly across from their developments. "A live, work and play" use at Jones Motor is the idea Mr. Costello was expressing.
Chairperson Adams commented that she would like to see Pennhurst as a mixed-use development and also suggested reducing the PO/GI tract along the Rt. 724 Corridor. Chairperson Adams would like to see an "Eagleview" type of development at the Pennhurst site. Mrs. Milito agreed with Chairperson Adams and Dr. Schwartz. Mrs. Milito would like to see the reduction of the PO/GI district so it doesn't have to go to Pennhurst. Mr. Costello mentioned that the PO/GI can be reduced at Pennhurst also.
PC member Lawson MacCartney stated that "our colleagues in Spring City don't want traffic to Pennhurst." PC Member Todd Bereda said "we need good uses to get people to stop in Spring City. If there is a good use at Pennhurst, this will give people a reason to stop." Spring City Borough Council Member, Jim Burns, mentioned that he lives off Church Street (one of the access point to the Pennhurst site) and he doesn't want to see the traffic. Dr. Schwartz said "we need a creative way of traffic flow".
Supervisor McNeil mentioned the Community Design Collaborative grant for the Pennhurst site. Mr. Costello is going to find out more about this.
The Planning Commission will host a working meeting with Mr. Costello, his client and the Spring City Borough, to continue to review the Rt. 724 Corridor and the possibility of rezoning.
Another issue regarding an amendment to the Open Space Design Option (OSDO) was discussed. Planner Ray Ott provided a document to the PC suggesting the reduction of the multiplier in the AP/RC (agricultural preservation and rural conservation) districts. Mr. Ott was scheduled to present his information but did not attend the meeting. Dr. Schwartz suggested reducing the multipliers more than Mr. Ott considered, or to get rid of the OSDO completely. He mentioned that the Phoenixville Regional Plan calls for East Vincent Township to have less density (number of homes). PC Member Bereda asked if the density is reduced in the AP/RC districts, how will this affect the LR, MR and HR (light, medium and high residential) districts? Will these districts have to increase density? Vice-Chair Herron had the same concern. Mrs. Milito suggested making a motion to approve Mr. Ott's cover letter which provided documentation regarding the the reduction of the multipliers in the AP/RC district. The rest of the PC did not want to take action due to questions pertaining to the information on the inside of Mr. Ott's document.
An amendment to the Open Space Map was approved by the Planning Commission and allows for more open space south of the PECO power lines. This particular open space addition to the map is located south of Rt. 23. This amendment to the Open Space Map will go to the Board of Supervisors.
The Planning Commission has no objections to the proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance in the Borough of Phoenixville. This proposed ordinance allows for a multi-residential district (townhouses) on a reduced tract of 5 acres. This proposal will now move forward to the Board of Supervisors.
The Board of Supervisors' meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, February 3, 2010 at 7:30 p.m.
Please continue to contact us with any questions about issues or proposals affecting our township.
Thank you and have a nice day!
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
Monday, January 18, 2010
East Vincent Township Planning Commission Meeting, January, 19, 2010 at 7:00 P.M.
The next East Vincent Township Planning Commission Meeting is tomorrow, Tuesday,
January 19, 2010 at 7:00 P.M. in the East Vincent Township Municipal Building, located at 262 Ridge Road.
The agenda for this meeting can be found at http://www.eastvincent.org/. Click on "Current Agenda" to view this agenda.
Amendments to the Open Space Map, Route 724 Corridor Rezoning and an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance by the Borough of Phoenixville, are on this agenda.
Please continue to contact us with any questions you may have about issues or proposals affecting our township.
Thank you,
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
January 19, 2010 at 7:00 P.M. in the East Vincent Township Municipal Building, located at 262 Ridge Road.
The agenda for this meeting can be found at http://www.eastvincent.org/. Click on "Current Agenda" to view this agenda.
Amendments to the Open Space Map, Route 724 Corridor Rezoning and an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance by the Borough of Phoenixville, are on this agenda.
Please continue to contact us with any questions you may have about issues or proposals affecting our township.
Thank you,
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Update: East Vincent Township Board of Supervisors' and Planning Commission Workshop Meeting
Last evening, Ordinance #203 was unanimously adopted by the East Vincent Township Board of Supervisors. This ordinance allows for commercial composting in light residential districts with 50 plus acres. Before the vote, Vice-Chair McNeil asked that the ordinance be changed from a 'by-right use' to a 'conditional use' so hours of operation, wastes included, liquid fuel travel and noise from the grinder can be regulated. Chairman Funk made it clear that Vice-Chair McNeil agreed to this amendment two weeks ago and she had personally attended all the Planning Commission Meetings and the Board of Supervisors' Public Hearing Meeting and she should have brought these issues up at those times. "Why the hold up?," asked Chairman Funk. Vice-Chair McNeil, said she wanted what was "agreed to verbally [at the mentioned meetings] to be put in writing." She wanted to "protect the residents near the facility." Supervisor Dunphy stated that there is a definition of composting and the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) regulates the permits, etc. Supervisor Dunphy didn't want to see limits in terms of the hours certain activities, such as grinding, could be done because this could cause the facility to be in violation of it's own permit. As a farmer, he stated that "certain things have to be done and if you have to grind, you have to grind, to make sure the facility operates properly and within the DEP permit guidelines." A spokesperson for the composting operation said the facility will not be using a tub grinder but one that puts out 81 decibels when standing next to it as compared to the 90 decibels which comes from the tub grinder. The Informed East Vincent Residents were in attendance at all of the same Planning Commission meetings Vice-Chair McNeil attended. We heard most of the same issues Mrs. McNeil brought forth at this meeting addressed. These issues were discussed thoroughly and often. We also were in attendance at the Public Workshop held by the Board of Supervisors where Vice-Chair McNeil had the opportunity to bring forth the issue of 'by-right.' She did not make this suggestion at that time. Hours of operation, permitted wastes, etc. were all addressed at the Public Workshop and the Planning Commission meetings that Vice-Chair McNeil attended. IEVR were also in attendance at the last Board of Supervisors' meeting, two weeks ago, when Vice-Chair McNeil agreed to support the amendment as written.
During the workshop meeting between the Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission several issues were addressed. The first issue brought forth was questioning how East Vincent Township (EVT) can become a walkable community with the Spring City Borough, The Spring City Borough is our urban center. The Planning Commission (PC) doesn't want to take away from the borough by building along Route 724. The PO (professional office/research/ industrial), GI (general industrial) and GC (general commercial) districts were areas to be studied. These districts are located along Route 724, West Bridge Street, Stoney Run Road and Mennonite Road. Does the township need such a large PO/GI/GC district? Another issue brought forth was what can be done about the Open Space Design Option (OSDO) which is encouraging growth in the Agricultural Preservation (AP) and Rural Conservation (RC) areas? The issue which involved the imbalance of having more sending areas (AP/RC) than receiving areas LR, MR, HR (light residential, medium residential and high residential), and the attempt to fix this by creating more receiving areas north of the PECO power lines, is another issue which needs to be addressed. Planning Commission Chairperson Adams said "There was a concern about sending development to one area and I sensed a division occurring in the township between north of the [PECO] power lines and south of the [PECO] power lines." PC Chairperson Adams is referring to the Transfer of Development Rights/ Open Space Design Option Ordinance Amendment (TDR/OSDO) utilizing a residential density multiplier, that was drawn up and close to approval back in September, 2008 (see post dated 9/18/08 for more information). Ms. Adams stated that "We need rural and open space on both sides of the township and that we should work with our partners in the borough and at Pennhurst when it comes to development." It was suggested that the density which could occur in the PO/GI/GC districts be moved to Pennhurst grounds. Ray Ott, EVT Planner has suggested that a 'mixed-use development' occur in the PO/GI/GC districts and this was put forth in the 'Route 724 Scope' the Planning Commission approved at their last meeting.
"No suburban sprawl along Route 724, walkable to Spring City Borough and commercialism of Route 724 is a mistake" were points certain Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors members seemed to be agreeing upon.
Discussion ensued about the use of Transfer of Development Rights(TDR). TDR's are used to send development to areas where development is deemed appropriate while saving lands in other parts of the township. Supervisor Dunphy stated that he has a "problem with the township being in the real estate business, feels the township should retire TDR's and feels there is a problem with the evaluation of the TDR's. Buying and selling of TDR's increases density in the township." EVT Planner Ott said TDR's have "never been very fluent with a simultaneous buyer and seller so this is why the municipality gets involved." Supervisor Dunphy also stated the "majority of open space money comes from taxpayers north of the [PECO] power lines yet the money is being used south of the [PECO] power lines." In other words, East Vincent taxpayers who reside north of the PECO power lines are putting .33% of their tax dollars to saving farms south of the PECO power lines and not in their backyard, where approximately 70% of the residents live. These PECO power lines can be seen intersecting West Bridge Street. Again, a small amount of open space money was used in administrative costs, etc., to acquire the park land at Pennhurst, given to the township by the owner of Pennhurst, as part of the agreement of sale with the State. Planning Commission Member Schwartz said he would like to retire TDR's. Dr. Schwartz also mentioned the fact that the PO/GI/GC [densities] are above what any other townships in the Phoenixville Regional Plan have and this is not what our township is about." Supervisor Dunphy suggested looking into studying and changing the PO/GI/GC districts.
Some final recommendations for the Planning Commission included eliminating the Open Space Design Option in the AP and RC districts. The Opens Space Design Option allows for clustering of the homes, and increased number of homes in a development, in order to leave open space surrounding the development. It was also recommended that there be a reduction and/or change concept to include mixed-use in the PO/GI/GC districts. The PO/GI/GC districts be considered for a use change (meaning instead of allowing for only offices or light industry=PO/GI/GC; allow for a combination of office and residential/walkable communities=mixed-use.) It was also suggested that the PO/GI/GC districts be moved to Pennhurst. Another option would be to get GI out of the Jones Motor area (if it is made residential) and that a GI use at Pennhurst would make more sense. Vice-Chair McNeil would like to see an "economic development analysis" before action is taken to move the PO/GI/GC districts. Vice-Chair McNeil would also like to see more 'green technology and sustainability' for future buildings and Chairman Funk would not like to see anymore single-family dwellings.
The last item the workshop focused on was the Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC) for the Ruth Tract (located on Stoney Run Road--- across from Kolb's Meats). The Planning Commission did not recommend the CCRC for the Ruth Tract. According to PC Chairperson Adams the reason for this is it's an "intense development in a rural area and unconnected to other uses." "It's isolated." Chairman Funk mentioned a client who has a CCRC called "Willow Valley," which is located in Lancaster and is isolated but has buses which take the people everywhere. Dr. Schwartz stated "it's out of context in the environment it's in." Chairman Funk mentioned the CCRC in West Vincent which is also isolated. He mentioned how the Ruth Tract CCRC isn't visible to most residents and how the township can get the developer to fix/expand the sewer plant so the taxpayer doesn't have to pay. Supervisor Dunphy said "We are close to maxing out of sewer capacity with the approved developments but we "don't build a sewer plant bigger than the need." PC Chairperson Adams stated "a developer sees a lot of EDU's (sewer capacity) and this 'sells' a township." Chairman Funk said a CCRC would not add more kids to the school district, residents don't drive and it's a tax base for the township." PC member Herron said he would like to make sure the "township money isn't invested in it and we end up with the CCRC flipping to non-profit and challenging the taxing. Make sure to get as much as we can upfront." Mrs. Milito expressed concern for the Stoney Run, Vice-Chair McNeil expressed concerns for lowering of property values and height of the potential CCRC above what our present ordinance allows. Supervisor Dunphy addressed the "isolation" of the Ruth location for a CCRC. He said "overseas I've seen seen communities built around these [CCRC] and the question is do we want to see it that way? It's phenomenal when it works; integrating a recreational component. Do we want to integrate, a possibility of having a nursery school, etc. to integrate?" The question is "Is this the right place for it?" Supervisor Dunphy also mentioned the needs of the landowner and he said the township has an obligation to look at the concept. Mrs. Milito said the "idea sounds great having these other things there" but she is concerned with the environmental placement. Supervisor Dunphy mentioned the abilities with the Latshaw tract; leave Latshaw open. He also made mention of the Camp Hill Models and if that's the direction for the township.
Please continue to contact us with any questions you may have about issues or proposals affecting our township.
Thank You,
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
During the workshop meeting between the Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission several issues were addressed. The first issue brought forth was questioning how East Vincent Township (EVT) can become a walkable community with the Spring City Borough, The Spring City Borough is our urban center. The Planning Commission (PC) doesn't want to take away from the borough by building along Route 724. The PO (professional office/research/ industrial), GI (general industrial) and GC (general commercial) districts were areas to be studied. These districts are located along Route 724, West Bridge Street, Stoney Run Road and Mennonite Road. Does the township need such a large PO/GI/GC district? Another issue brought forth was what can be done about the Open Space Design Option (OSDO) which is encouraging growth in the Agricultural Preservation (AP) and Rural Conservation (RC) areas? The issue which involved the imbalance of having more sending areas (AP/RC) than receiving areas LR, MR, HR (light residential, medium residential and high residential), and the attempt to fix this by creating more receiving areas north of the PECO power lines, is another issue which needs to be addressed. Planning Commission Chairperson Adams said "There was a concern about sending development to one area and I sensed a division occurring in the township between north of the [PECO] power lines and south of the [PECO] power lines." PC Chairperson Adams is referring to the Transfer of Development Rights/ Open Space Design Option Ordinance Amendment (TDR/OSDO) utilizing a residential density multiplier, that was drawn up and close to approval back in September, 2008 (see post dated 9/18/08 for more information). Ms. Adams stated that "We need rural and open space on both sides of the township and that we should work with our partners in the borough and at Pennhurst when it comes to development." It was suggested that the density which could occur in the PO/GI/GC districts be moved to Pennhurst grounds. Ray Ott, EVT Planner has suggested that a 'mixed-use development' occur in the PO/GI/GC districts and this was put forth in the 'Route 724 Scope' the Planning Commission approved at their last meeting.
"No suburban sprawl along Route 724, walkable to Spring City Borough and commercialism of Route 724 is a mistake" were points certain Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors members seemed to be agreeing upon.
Discussion ensued about the use of Transfer of Development Rights(TDR). TDR's are used to send development to areas where development is deemed appropriate while saving lands in other parts of the township. Supervisor Dunphy stated that he has a "problem with the township being in the real estate business, feels the township should retire TDR's and feels there is a problem with the evaluation of the TDR's. Buying and selling of TDR's increases density in the township." EVT Planner Ott said TDR's have "never been very fluent with a simultaneous buyer and seller so this is why the municipality gets involved." Supervisor Dunphy also stated the "majority of open space money comes from taxpayers north of the [PECO] power lines yet the money is being used south of the [PECO] power lines." In other words, East Vincent taxpayers who reside north of the PECO power lines are putting .33% of their tax dollars to saving farms south of the PECO power lines and not in their backyard, where approximately 70% of the residents live. These PECO power lines can be seen intersecting West Bridge Street. Again, a small amount of open space money was used in administrative costs, etc., to acquire the park land at Pennhurst, given to the township by the owner of Pennhurst, as part of the agreement of sale with the State. Planning Commission Member Schwartz said he would like to retire TDR's. Dr. Schwartz also mentioned the fact that the PO/GI/GC [densities] are above what any other townships in the Phoenixville Regional Plan have and this is not what our township is about." Supervisor Dunphy suggested looking into studying and changing the PO/GI/GC districts.
Some final recommendations for the Planning Commission included eliminating the Open Space Design Option in the AP and RC districts. The Opens Space Design Option allows for clustering of the homes, and increased number of homes in a development, in order to leave open space surrounding the development. It was also recommended that there be a reduction and/or change concept to include mixed-use in the PO/GI/GC districts. The PO/GI/GC districts be considered for a use change (meaning instead of allowing for only offices or light industry=PO/GI/GC; allow for a combination of office and residential/walkable communities=mixed-use.) It was also suggested that the PO/GI/GC districts be moved to Pennhurst. Another option would be to get GI out of the Jones Motor area (if it is made residential) and that a GI use at Pennhurst would make more sense. Vice-Chair McNeil would like to see an "economic development analysis" before action is taken to move the PO/GI/GC districts. Vice-Chair McNeil would also like to see more 'green technology and sustainability' for future buildings and Chairman Funk would not like to see anymore single-family dwellings.
The last item the workshop focused on was the Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC) for the Ruth Tract (located on Stoney Run Road--- across from Kolb's Meats). The Planning Commission did not recommend the CCRC for the Ruth Tract. According to PC Chairperson Adams the reason for this is it's an "intense development in a rural area and unconnected to other uses." "It's isolated." Chairman Funk mentioned a client who has a CCRC called "Willow Valley," which is located in Lancaster and is isolated but has buses which take the people everywhere. Dr. Schwartz stated "it's out of context in the environment it's in." Chairman Funk mentioned the CCRC in West Vincent which is also isolated. He mentioned how the Ruth Tract CCRC isn't visible to most residents and how the township can get the developer to fix/expand the sewer plant so the taxpayer doesn't have to pay. Supervisor Dunphy said "We are close to maxing out of sewer capacity with the approved developments but we "don't build a sewer plant bigger than the need." PC Chairperson Adams stated "a developer sees a lot of EDU's (sewer capacity) and this 'sells' a township." Chairman Funk said a CCRC would not add more kids to the school district, residents don't drive and it's a tax base for the township." PC member Herron said he would like to make sure the "township money isn't invested in it and we end up with the CCRC flipping to non-profit and challenging the taxing. Make sure to get as much as we can upfront." Mrs. Milito expressed concern for the Stoney Run, Vice-Chair McNeil expressed concerns for lowering of property values and height of the potential CCRC above what our present ordinance allows. Supervisor Dunphy addressed the "isolation" of the Ruth location for a CCRC. He said "overseas I've seen seen communities built around these [CCRC] and the question is do we want to see it that way? It's phenomenal when it works; integrating a recreational component. Do we want to integrate, a possibility of having a nursery school, etc. to integrate?" The question is "Is this the right place for it?" Supervisor Dunphy also mentioned the needs of the landowner and he said the township has an obligation to look at the concept. Mrs. Milito said the "idea sounds great having these other things there" but she is concerned with the environmental placement. Supervisor Dunphy mentioned the abilities with the Latshaw tract; leave Latshaw open. He also made mention of the Camp Hill Models and if that's the direction for the township.
Please continue to contact us with any questions you may have about issues or proposals affecting our township.
Thank You,
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
Sunday, December 13, 2009
Reminder: East Vincent Board of Supervisors' and Planning Commission Workshop Meeting, Monday, December 14 at 7:00 P.M. Organic Composting Decision.
The East Vincent Township Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission will hold a workshop meeting this Monday, December 14 at 7:00 p.m. in the East Vincent Township Municipal Building located at 262 Ridge Road, Spring City.
This workshop meeting is being held to allow our Board of Supervisors, Planning Commission and Spring City Borough Council the opportunity for input and discussion pertaining to the Route 724 Corridor/Scope, possible zoning changes, Transfer of Development Rights issues and other possible land use issues.
The zoning amendment to allow for an organic composting facility on Pennhurst grounds, and future Light Residential Districts of 50 plus acres, is expected to be unanimously approved by the Board of Supervisors at this meeting. An article that may be of interest to our readers about the organic composting issue; including mention of the local Foley composting facility can be found at http://www.philly.com/ and is titled "Interest Stirred By Commercial-Grade Composting," dated November 27, 2009.
The East Vincent Township Planning Commission made a site visit to the Foley operation, found it acceptable and approved the ordinance amendment to go forward to the Board of Supervisors.
Please continue to contact us with any questions or concerns you may have about issues and/or proposals affecting our township.
Thank You and Have A Nice Day,
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
This workshop meeting is being held to allow our Board of Supervisors, Planning Commission and Spring City Borough Council the opportunity for input and discussion pertaining to the Route 724 Corridor/Scope, possible zoning changes, Transfer of Development Rights issues and other possible land use issues.
The zoning amendment to allow for an organic composting facility on Pennhurst grounds, and future Light Residential Districts of 50 plus acres, is expected to be unanimously approved by the Board of Supervisors at this meeting. An article that may be of interest to our readers about the organic composting issue; including mention of the local Foley composting facility can be found at http://www.philly.com/ and is titled "Interest Stirred By Commercial-Grade Composting," dated November 27, 2009.
The East Vincent Township Planning Commission made a site visit to the Foley operation, found it acceptable and approved the ordinance amendment to go forward to the Board of Supervisors.
Please continue to contact us with any questions or concerns you may have about issues and/or proposals affecting our township.
Thank You and Have A Nice Day,
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
Friday, December 4, 2009
Update: East Vincent Township Board of Supervisors' Meeting, December 2, 2009. PennOrganics Composting Site to be Unanimously Approved.
Resolution #09-12-02-01-Final Adoption of the Phoenixville Regional Comprehensive Plan Consistency Review Report, was approved. Although East Vincent Township Supervisors Funk and Dunphy would like to see East Vincent Township removed from this regional plan, East Vincent must remain with the regional group for one year.
KSK, the planners for the Phoenixville Regional Plan, sent correspondence to the township in regard to a cost proposal for reviewing our zoning ordinance amendment. Supervisor Dunphy; who voted "No" to joining the Phoenixville Regional Plan in February 2008, asked the Phoenixville Regional Planning Commission (PRPC) members present at this meeting, "Who approved the proposal, who authorized KSK to do this?" Mr. Dunphy pointed out that the PRPC did not have their scheduled meeting but hired KSK to draft a proposal of opinions from the PRPC, who had yet to have their scheduled meeting. Supervisor Dunphy wanted to know who approved spending $1,000 on KSK to provide opinions on the zoning ordinance. None of the Phoenixville Regional Plan Committee members answered the question. Chairman Funk stated "It's clear somebody jumped the gun" in allowing KSK to provide recommendations. East Vincent Township Representatives didn't share with the PRPC or KSK the opinions of East Vincent Township for if they had there would have been no reason to hire KSK, as many of the issues addressed by KSK were brought to light at East Vincent Planning Commission meetings, Board of Supervisors' meetings and Public Hearings held in the township. Our township representatives to the Phoenixville Regional Planning Committee are Vice-Chair McNeil and Mrs. Elaine Milito. Clare Quinn, the West Vincent Township Supervisor and PRPC member explained the draft is drawn, goes to the PRPC for approval, disapproval, etc. "KSK develops, then PRPC discusses, as the Phoenixville Regional Planning Commission Members all have jobs, are supervisors, etc. and can't read through all the ordinances." Vice-Chair McNeil said she did bring forth the financial benefits, the developer in mind, etc. to the PRPC.
Chairman Funk had two suggestions for the PRPC: 1. Approve the CCRC text change since East Vincent Township zoning already allows for hospitals, nursing homes, schools, age-restricted community, etc in the LR, MR, and HR districts. The zoning ordinance was merely a "text" change and not really a "use" change. He noted that the PRPC members should know this [EVT Ordinances] so why they said "No" to this ordinance doesn't make any sense to him. Mr. Funk spoke directly to the PRPC member from East Pikeland and said "You have them why can't we? You have two gold geese with the CCRC's in your township." Mr. Strauss replied that "we have them in our growth zone" to which Mr. Funk reminded him about the zoning changes along Route 113. The second suggestion was to get rid of the PRP Planners KSK. Chairman Funk feels having planners who are unfamiliar with our area; such as KSK, don't know the area well enough to understand the needs of the area.
Clare Quinn said PRPC is an advisory group. Stu Cohen, township solicitor, challenged this and said "East Vincent Township can't adopt a change in zoning unless it gets approval [from the PRPC] or we withdraw (Article 17)." Vice-Chair McNeil said "If there is a dispute [between what the municipality wants and what the PRPC wants] we can go through a mediation process but can't adopt without the approval." It was pointed out that township representatives "don't vote in light of the municipality [the decision of the Board of Supervisors] but vote in light of the consistency of the Phoenixville Regional Plan. "Submerge individual municipal plans to the Phoenixville Regional Plan." In other words, the municipality seems to be conforming to the regional plans, and this includes, but is not limited to, assuring residential density zoning and growth areas, for example, are consistent with the Phoenixville Regional Plan and therefore not what is necessarily in the best interest of East Vincent Township (in the opinion of the Informed East Vincent Residents.)
In other matters, Vice-Chair McNeil again presented to Chairman Funk and Supervisor Dunphy a request of $4,500.00 in taxpayer dollars for the Master Plan with East Coventry for the Parkerford Tavern area. After lengthy discussion, Supervisor Dunphy voted "No" and stated "We already spent $35,000 on a Master Plan for the Parker Ford Tavern. Towpath Park is right down the road, has all the facilities and putting money toward this Master Plan during these tough times is redundant. If Towpath Park wasn't already there I would agree to this." Chairman Funk compromised, and agreed to add $5000.00 to the EVT Park and Recreation Budget, in January, for the possibility of getting the PECO Green Energy Grant to have a Master Plan developed.
The 2010 Proposed Budget was adopted and available for review and comment through December 14.
Chief Demski reported that the burglary suspect has been arrested. He also reported that the police budget is down 9%. This is a result of not purchasing a new vehicle (these are routinely replaced every year), the loss of an officer who has not been replaced and the loss of a part-time officer who is deploying for Afghanistan and will not be replaced. There has also been a cut in the operating budget; for example, training. A resident asked if this will affect the availability of officers for emergencies, etc. Chairman Funk responded that many townships don't have their own police force and rely on the State Police. The resident made it clear that he felt spending money on roofs and parks is not as important as spending the money on the security of the residents.
Ordinance #202-Amending Chapter 15, Part 4 General Parking Regulation. A Motion advertising a $25.00 fine for parking along cul-de-sacs and other emergency roads during snow events, therefore impeding the ability for the Roadmaster to clear the roads, was approved.
Resolution #09-12-02-05--Granting Conditional Preliminary and Final Land Development Plan Approval for the Southeastern Veterans Center Expansion, was approved.
All Resolutions for the Open Space Amendment and Acquisition of TDR's for the Shantz Property (located on Bethel Road), were approved.
East Vincent Township residents extend their deepest sympathies to the Holoka Family/Ridge Fire Company and to the Cockerham family.
Please be sure to attend the Public Workshop meeting on Monday, December 14 at 7:00 P.M. in the East Vincent Township Municipal Building located at 262 Ridge Road. The Board of Supervisors will meet with the Planning Commission and the Spring City Borough to discuss the Route 724 corridor and other issues affecting our township. Also, last evening, all three supervisors--- Mr. Funk, Mrs. McNeil and Mr. Dunphy UNANIMOUSLY agreed to vote "yes" on the organic compost site on the Pennhurst grounds. This organic compost site operation was previously approved by the Planning Commission. This vote will take place on Monday, December 14th at the Public Workshop meeting.
Please feel free to contact us with any questions or concerns you may have about issues or proposals affecting our township.
Thank You and Have a Nice Day,
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidentsgroup.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
KSK, the planners for the Phoenixville Regional Plan, sent correspondence to the township in regard to a cost proposal for reviewing our zoning ordinance amendment. Supervisor Dunphy; who voted "No" to joining the Phoenixville Regional Plan in February 2008, asked the Phoenixville Regional Planning Commission (PRPC) members present at this meeting, "Who approved the proposal, who authorized KSK to do this?" Mr. Dunphy pointed out that the PRPC did not have their scheduled meeting but hired KSK to draft a proposal of opinions from the PRPC, who had yet to have their scheduled meeting. Supervisor Dunphy wanted to know who approved spending $1,000 on KSK to provide opinions on the zoning ordinance. None of the Phoenixville Regional Plan Committee members answered the question. Chairman Funk stated "It's clear somebody jumped the gun" in allowing KSK to provide recommendations. East Vincent Township Representatives didn't share with the PRPC or KSK the opinions of East Vincent Township for if they had there would have been no reason to hire KSK, as many of the issues addressed by KSK were brought to light at East Vincent Planning Commission meetings, Board of Supervisors' meetings and Public Hearings held in the township. Our township representatives to the Phoenixville Regional Planning Committee are Vice-Chair McNeil and Mrs. Elaine Milito. Clare Quinn, the West Vincent Township Supervisor and PRPC member explained the draft is drawn, goes to the PRPC for approval, disapproval, etc. "KSK develops, then PRPC discusses, as the Phoenixville Regional Planning Commission Members all have jobs, are supervisors, etc. and can't read through all the ordinances." Vice-Chair McNeil said she did bring forth the financial benefits, the developer in mind, etc. to the PRPC.
Chairman Funk had two suggestions for the PRPC: 1. Approve the CCRC text change since East Vincent Township zoning already allows for hospitals, nursing homes, schools, age-restricted community, etc in the LR, MR, and HR districts. The zoning ordinance was merely a "text" change and not really a "use" change. He noted that the PRPC members should know this [EVT Ordinances] so why they said "No" to this ordinance doesn't make any sense to him. Mr. Funk spoke directly to the PRPC member from East Pikeland and said "You have them why can't we? You have two gold geese with the CCRC's in your township." Mr. Strauss replied that "we have them in our growth zone" to which Mr. Funk reminded him about the zoning changes along Route 113. The second suggestion was to get rid of the PRP Planners KSK. Chairman Funk feels having planners who are unfamiliar with our area; such as KSK, don't know the area well enough to understand the needs of the area.
Clare Quinn said PRPC is an advisory group. Stu Cohen, township solicitor, challenged this and said "East Vincent Township can't adopt a change in zoning unless it gets approval [from the PRPC] or we withdraw (Article 17)." Vice-Chair McNeil said "If there is a dispute [between what the municipality wants and what the PRPC wants] we can go through a mediation process but can't adopt without the approval." It was pointed out that township representatives "don't vote in light of the municipality [the decision of the Board of Supervisors] but vote in light of the consistency of the Phoenixville Regional Plan. "Submerge individual municipal plans to the Phoenixville Regional Plan." In other words, the municipality seems to be conforming to the regional plans, and this includes, but is not limited to, assuring residential density zoning and growth areas, for example, are consistent with the Phoenixville Regional Plan and therefore not what is necessarily in the best interest of East Vincent Township (in the opinion of the Informed East Vincent Residents.)
In other matters, Vice-Chair McNeil again presented to Chairman Funk and Supervisor Dunphy a request of $4,500.00 in taxpayer dollars for the Master Plan with East Coventry for the Parkerford Tavern area. After lengthy discussion, Supervisor Dunphy voted "No" and stated "We already spent $35,000 on a Master Plan for the Parker Ford Tavern. Towpath Park is right down the road, has all the facilities and putting money toward this Master Plan during these tough times is redundant. If Towpath Park wasn't already there I would agree to this." Chairman Funk compromised, and agreed to add $5000.00 to the EVT Park and Recreation Budget, in January, for the possibility of getting the PECO Green Energy Grant to have a Master Plan developed.
The 2010 Proposed Budget was adopted and available for review and comment through December 14.
Chief Demski reported that the burglary suspect has been arrested. He also reported that the police budget is down 9%. This is a result of not purchasing a new vehicle (these are routinely replaced every year), the loss of an officer who has not been replaced and the loss of a part-time officer who is deploying for Afghanistan and will not be replaced. There has also been a cut in the operating budget; for example, training. A resident asked if this will affect the availability of officers for emergencies, etc. Chairman Funk responded that many townships don't have their own police force and rely on the State Police. The resident made it clear that he felt spending money on roofs and parks is not as important as spending the money on the security of the residents.
Ordinance #202-Amending Chapter 15, Part 4 General Parking Regulation. A Motion advertising a $25.00 fine for parking along cul-de-sacs and other emergency roads during snow events, therefore impeding the ability for the Roadmaster to clear the roads, was approved.
Resolution #09-12-02-05--Granting Conditional Preliminary and Final Land Development Plan Approval for the Southeastern Veterans Center Expansion, was approved.
All Resolutions for the Open Space Amendment and Acquisition of TDR's for the Shantz Property (located on Bethel Road), were approved.
East Vincent Township residents extend their deepest sympathies to the Holoka Family/Ridge Fire Company and to the Cockerham family.
Please be sure to attend the Public Workshop meeting on Monday, December 14 at 7:00 P.M. in the East Vincent Township Municipal Building located at 262 Ridge Road. The Board of Supervisors will meet with the Planning Commission and the Spring City Borough to discuss the Route 724 corridor and other issues affecting our township. Also, last evening, all three supervisors--- Mr. Funk, Mrs. McNeil and Mr. Dunphy UNANIMOUSLY agreed to vote "yes" on the organic compost site on the Pennhurst grounds. This organic compost site operation was previously approved by the Planning Commission. This vote will take place on Monday, December 14th at the Public Workshop meeting.
Please feel free to contact us with any questions or concerns you may have about issues or proposals affecting our township.
Thank You and Have a Nice Day,
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidentsgroup.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
East Vincent Township Board of Supervisors' Meeting, Wednesday, December 2, 2009 at 7:30 P.M.
The next scheduled East Vincent Township Board of Supervisors' Meeting is tomorrow, Wednesday, December 2 at 7:30 p.m. in the East Vincent Township Municipal Building located at 262 Ridge Road.
To view the current agenda for this meeting, please click on the following link: http://www.eastvincent.org/.
Thank You and Have A Nice Day,
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
To view the current agenda for this meeting, please click on the following link: http://www.eastvincent.org/.
Thank You and Have A Nice Day,
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Last evening, the Planning Commission (PC) forwarded to the Board of Supervisors a Motion Recommending Preliminary Final Land Development for the Southeastern Veteran's Center. The Motion was then amended to request that the Board of Supervisors consider any improvements, such as walking trails. The spokesperson for the veteran's center expressed security concerns with having walking trails on the property. He stated "Personally, I think it's a dangerous thing," when asked why walking trails are not included in the plan. The ability of staff to keep an eye on the veterans at all times was the main concern. Presently, out of 314 veterans, 20 are capable of leaving the grounds on their own. Also, the request from the Planning Commission for a Green Roof is not an option for this facility, according to the spokesperson. Two reasons were provided to the PC for this decision and were based upon the National Fire Safety Code; the function of the building and height of the building. The Department of Health, according to the spokesperson, does not approve Green Roofs on certain commercial facilities or long-term care facilities.
The Motion to Add The Schantz Farm Acquisition to the Open Space Map, was approved. The Schantz Farm is located on Bethel Road, south of Route 23, and is situated in both East Vincent and East Coventry.
The Route 724 Corridor Scope was discussed. Ray Ott, EVT Planner addressed the Transportation Aspect, Economic Development Aspect, Recreational Aspect and Zoning Aspect of the Scope. The issue on the table is how to seek funding to put the Route 724 Scope into action. Presently there's not a lot of money, a.k.a. grants, available. Dr. Schwartz would like to see how traffic can move better from East Vincent Township into Montgomery County without going through Spring City, addressed. Mr. Herron would like to see this Planning Commission take action instead of just talking about what they would like to see done with the Rt. 724 Corridor. He feels due to lack of action, grant opportunities are being missed. In response to Mr. Herron's statement, a Motion to Adopt the Route 724 Scope was approved by the PC. The Planning Commission will meet with the Board of Supervisors and the Spring City Borough to discuss and address issues in the Route 724 Scope on December 14, 2009 at 7:00 P.M. The public is welcome to attend this meeting but will not be permitted to have any input. (Please see the post dated 3-19-09 Update of Planning Commission Meeting to see why the Informed East Vincent Residents feel this is not what we were previously told.)
Mrs. Milito asked that the Planning Commission request the Board of Supervisors to rethink the Master Plan decision with East Coventry. Chairman Funk and Supervisor Dunphy both voted "no" to using more taxpayer dollars for another park plan at this time (see post dated November 5, 2009). This Master Plan would be for the Parker Ford Tavern Area. East Vincent Township taxpayers and East Coventry Township taxpayers would each put $4,500.00 toward a PECO Green Energy Grant to have a Master Plan drawn up for the area. Mrs. Milito also requested that the Planning Commission talk to the Board of Supervisors about pulling out of the Phoenixville Regional Plan (see post dated November 5, 2009 for more information). Chair Adams said we have to be in compliance with the Phoenixville Regional Plan for a year so this issue and the Master Plan issue can all be addressed at the workshop meeting scheduled for December 14. It was also noted that the process to remove East Vincent Township from the Phoenixville Regional Plan is in effect.
One resident asked the Planning Commission to define exactly where the Route 724 Corridor is located; Point A to Point B. Is it just the area directly along Route 724? Mr. Ott stated that the Rt. 724 Corridor keeps "getting bigger and bigger and includes land on both sides of Route 724 but also includes the PO, GI and GC Districts." These districts are located along Rt. 724, Stoney Run Road, West Bridge Street, and Mennonite Road. Also, the zoning of the PO, GI and GC districts may go from single-use zoning; such as office buildings, to a mixed-use zoning which includes a mix of commercial and residential properties. These Districts were also mentioned as slated for increased residential density for the transferring of development rights (TDR) at the last PC meeting.
Residents concerned about future land use plans conceptualized by the Route 724 Corridor Scope (which includes zoning and residential density changes) are strongly encouraged to attend the December 14 workshop meeting to learn firsthand what your elected and appointed officials would like to see happen right in your own backyard.
Please feel free to contact us with any questions or concerns you may have about issues or proposals affecting our township.
Thank You and Have A Nice Day,
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
The Motion to Add The Schantz Farm Acquisition to the Open Space Map, was approved. The Schantz Farm is located on Bethel Road, south of Route 23, and is situated in both East Vincent and East Coventry.
The Route 724 Corridor Scope was discussed. Ray Ott, EVT Planner addressed the Transportation Aspect, Economic Development Aspect, Recreational Aspect and Zoning Aspect of the Scope. The issue on the table is how to seek funding to put the Route 724 Scope into action. Presently there's not a lot of money, a.k.a. grants, available. Dr. Schwartz would like to see how traffic can move better from East Vincent Township into Montgomery County without going through Spring City, addressed. Mr. Herron would like to see this Planning Commission take action instead of just talking about what they would like to see done with the Rt. 724 Corridor. He feels due to lack of action, grant opportunities are being missed. In response to Mr. Herron's statement, a Motion to Adopt the Route 724 Scope was approved by the PC. The Planning Commission will meet with the Board of Supervisors and the Spring City Borough to discuss and address issues in the Route 724 Scope on December 14, 2009 at 7:00 P.M. The public is welcome to attend this meeting but will not be permitted to have any input. (Please see the post dated 3-19-09 Update of Planning Commission Meeting to see why the Informed East Vincent Residents feel this is not what we were previously told.)
Mrs. Milito asked that the Planning Commission request the Board of Supervisors to rethink the Master Plan decision with East Coventry. Chairman Funk and Supervisor Dunphy both voted "no" to using more taxpayer dollars for another park plan at this time (see post dated November 5, 2009). This Master Plan would be for the Parker Ford Tavern Area. East Vincent Township taxpayers and East Coventry Township taxpayers would each put $4,500.00 toward a PECO Green Energy Grant to have a Master Plan drawn up for the area. Mrs. Milito also requested that the Planning Commission talk to the Board of Supervisors about pulling out of the Phoenixville Regional Plan (see post dated November 5, 2009 for more information). Chair Adams said we have to be in compliance with the Phoenixville Regional Plan for a year so this issue and the Master Plan issue can all be addressed at the workshop meeting scheduled for December 14. It was also noted that the process to remove East Vincent Township from the Phoenixville Regional Plan is in effect.
One resident asked the Planning Commission to define exactly where the Route 724 Corridor is located; Point A to Point B. Is it just the area directly along Route 724? Mr. Ott stated that the Rt. 724 Corridor keeps "getting bigger and bigger and includes land on both sides of Route 724 but also includes the PO, GI and GC Districts." These districts are located along Rt. 724, Stoney Run Road, West Bridge Street, and Mennonite Road. Also, the zoning of the PO, GI and GC districts may go from single-use zoning; such as office buildings, to a mixed-use zoning which includes a mix of commercial and residential properties. These Districts were also mentioned as slated for increased residential density for the transferring of development rights (TDR) at the last PC meeting.
Residents concerned about future land use plans conceptualized by the Route 724 Corridor Scope (which includes zoning and residential density changes) are strongly encouraged to attend the December 14 workshop meeting to learn firsthand what your elected and appointed officials would like to see happen right in your own backyard.
Please feel free to contact us with any questions or concerns you may have about issues or proposals affecting our township.
Thank You and Have A Nice Day,
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
Sunday, November 22, 2009
East Vincent Township Planning Commission Meeting, Monday November 23, 2009 at 7:00 P.M.
The East Vincent Township Planning Commission Meeting is scheduled for tomorrow, Monday, November 23, 2009 at 7:00 P.M. in the East Vincent Township Municipal Building located at 262 Ridge Road.
To view the agenda for this meeting use the following link: http://www.eastvincent.org/
Thank You and Have A Nice Day,
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastresidents@gmail.com
To view the agenda for this meeting use the following link: http://www.eastvincent.org/
Thank You and Have A Nice Day,
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastresidents@gmail.com
Thursday, November 5, 2009
Update: East Vincent Township Board of Supervisors' Meeting, November 4, 2009
The proposed zoning amendment to allow for a composting facility was discussed at length last evening at the Public Hearing previous to the Board of Supervisors' meeting. Access roads to the facility include Church Street, Pennhurst and Brown Drive. James Burns of the Spring City Borough has "no objections to the organic composting operation at Pennhurst," but is concerned with commercial access and stated "the Borough could impose weight limits for trucks using Church Street to limit using this road as an access point." Todd Bereda of the East Vincent Township Planning Commission reiterated that the Planning Commissions' fears about this operation were alleviated upon a site visit to the Yost Organic Composting Operation. He also stated that he "appreciates each municipality having a voice but is concerned that a private business can be dictated to in regard to access. These are the same roadways the National Guard goes over; roadways we all pay for and that are state roads also." The size of the trucks coming in and out of the facility were described as landscaping-type vehicles and pick-up trucks. The organic composting operation would be closed on Sunday (unless there were an emergency such as downed trees) and would sell to local residents, landscapers and garden shops. The owner assured the Board that no animal carcasses will be allowed. Only yard waste (i.e. leaves, branches), pre-consumer waste (i.e. corn husks) and post-consumer waste ( i.e. bits of hamburger, fruits, etc.) would be permitted in the organic composting. The chipper would be used 5-6 1/2 times weekly. If the organic compost is not marketable the company is in violation of the DEP Permit and the product will have to be hauled away in a container. Any complaints to the DEP are responded to within one day and it's in the best interests of the organic compost company to operate this facility properly to produce a marketable product and assure there is no odor. If this amendment passes, other areas where an operation of this nature may occur include Armory Drive, the Solty's Tract and the Ruth Tract. Residents expressed concerns about traffic, the ability of vehicles to maneuver on these roads and concern for the safety of veterans who often walk to the CVS on these roads. A petition was turned over to the Board of Supervisors by those who are against this facility. One resident who lives in the area stated his support for the organic composting operation.
The Board approved the purchase of 25 transferable development rights (TDR) at 710 West Seven Stars Road at the cost of $817,300.00 Open Space dollars.
The Board also approved the purchase of 41 transfer of development rights (TDR) at the Schantz Farm located at Brownback's Church Road and Bethel Road for $1,047,796.00 Open Space dollars.
Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) are used to preserve land deemed worthy of saving in order to send development where deemed appropriate. All residents pay .33% of their tax dollars toward open space, presently all the open space monies have gone south of the PECO power lines with the exception of a tiny bit used in administrative costs when the State gave us the 82 acres at Pennhurst to EVT as part of the agreement of sale with the owner of Pennhurst.
East Vincent still has a surplus of $179,000.00 but we are down in revenue by $49,000.00. Township Manager Mary Flagg stated she "hopes we may come even by years end." Property assessments are coming down and therefore the tax revenue is also down. Chairman Funk stated the township may have to look into raising taxes, finding revenue sources and ask that the school district look at their budget ( a large portion of our tax dollars goes to the Owen J. Roberts School District).
The Approval to Advertise the Phoenixville Regional Planning Committee Final Consistency Review Report Acceptance was not approved. Chairman Funk made a motion directing our Township Solicitor to provide us with the necessary information needed to withdraw from the Phoenixville Regional Plan. Supervisor Dunphy seconded this motion. Chairman Funk stated his reasons as "the plan being more trouble than it's worth." He stated that "the Board voted for an amendment to our zoning and our representative (Vice-Chair McNeil) voted against the Boards' decision" (and therefore not in accordance with the Boards' decision). Supervisor Dunphy stated he agrees with regional planning but feels our township would be better served working within our school district and not Phoenixville and Great Valley's School Districts. He doesn't feel we should allow Phoenixville and Charlestown Townships to dictate our planning. He stated that "the TDR issue is complex and when you talk about any use in the township you have to keep in mind you can't do density without TDR's. This is not just about a CCRC issue." Vice-Chair McNeil said the only townships included in the Pottstown Regional Plan are East Coventry and North Coventry. She feels we've spent eight years on the Phoenixville Regional Plan and since it's in Chester County we should stay with it. She also said that the Phoenixville Regional Planning Commission is not against a CCRC in East Vincent Township but would like to see it in the mixed-use district. Vice-Chair McNeil also stated that regional TDR's may soon be an option. This means TDR's can transfer from one municipality to another. In other words, development can be sent from one township to the other. Presently, as one IEVR stated, East Vincent Township appears to have the most available mixed-use, commercial and industrial lands available in the entire Phoenixville Planning Region.
In regard to the CCRC issue, IEVR would like to remind the readers that the land known as the Latshaw tract is in a sending area for TDR's. Therefore, the owner of this land (who initially wanted a CCRC on the Latshaw tract---and Mrs. McNeil felt was a "worth looking into," and IEVR would like to stress that this area is in a sending area and the Stoney Run Watershed), can buy TDR's from the township if he so chooses and then send the development to a receiving area. The size of the development will depend on how many TDR's are available to the developer. Presently, East Vincent Township has not retired the TDR's but is "banking" them. Simply put, the more you have in the "bank," the more opportunity for development north of the PECO power lines where the receiving areas exist. Supervisor Dunphy has repeatedly stated he would like the Board of Supervisors' and Planning Commission to look at our zoning in a holistic way, along with the Rt. 724 Corridor and TDR's, to determine the best approach to development in our township. He would like our residents and appointed/elected officials to make this determination; not just an outside advisory board such as the Phoenixville Regional Plan.
Ms. Flagg stated that there is virtually no revenue from development in the long run; to educate costs more money than a homeowner pays in taxes to the township. Single-family homes raise costs and raise taxes. The question is how can East Vincent Township mitigate the contribution to the Owen J. Roberts School District (for the taxpayer)?
A resident from West Bridge Street requested that the Board "look at all the unintended consequences of certain development and make sure the Township gets the type of revenue it's looking for."
Chairman Funk and Supervisor Dunphy voted "no" to spending $4,500 of taxpayer dollars for a Master Plan with East Coventry for the Schuylkill River Heritage Trail area. Vice-Chair McNeil feels we can get a PECO Green Energy Grant to offset costs. Chairman Funk feels the County should take the lead in this and Supervisor Dunphy stated that "we already have our hands full. We have the Reiff Park to plan for, and the 82 acres at Pennhurst to plan for, so let's finish what we have before spending more money on another plan."
The request for $1,000 donation to French and Pickering Creek is under advisement at this time.
Chief Demski reported there were two burglaries in the area; one in Barton Meadows and another on Brownback's Church Road. It's possible these homes were targeted specifically. The suspect is known but has not been found. In a separate incident, a burglar who broke into a home on Clover Hill Road, was caught.
During Public Comment, one resident mentioned that the Memorial at Pennhurst looks nice. He also asked what kind of camera was used to take the photos of the restoration of the Parkerford Tavern. He felt the cost of the pictures at $1,100 was a lot of money for what the Township received.
Please feel free to contact us with any questions you may have about any proposals or issues affecting our township.
Thank You and Have A Nice day,
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
The Board approved the purchase of 25 transferable development rights (TDR) at 710 West Seven Stars Road at the cost of $817,300.00 Open Space dollars.
The Board also approved the purchase of 41 transfer of development rights (TDR) at the Schantz Farm located at Brownback's Church Road and Bethel Road for $1,047,796.00 Open Space dollars.
Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) are used to preserve land deemed worthy of saving in order to send development where deemed appropriate. All residents pay .33% of their tax dollars toward open space, presently all the open space monies have gone south of the PECO power lines with the exception of a tiny bit used in administrative costs when the State gave us the 82 acres at Pennhurst to EVT as part of the agreement of sale with the owner of Pennhurst.
East Vincent still has a surplus of $179,000.00 but we are down in revenue by $49,000.00. Township Manager Mary Flagg stated she "hopes we may come even by years end." Property assessments are coming down and therefore the tax revenue is also down. Chairman Funk stated the township may have to look into raising taxes, finding revenue sources and ask that the school district look at their budget ( a large portion of our tax dollars goes to the Owen J. Roberts School District).
The Approval to Advertise the Phoenixville Regional Planning Committee Final Consistency Review Report Acceptance was not approved. Chairman Funk made a motion directing our Township Solicitor to provide us with the necessary information needed to withdraw from the Phoenixville Regional Plan. Supervisor Dunphy seconded this motion. Chairman Funk stated his reasons as "the plan being more trouble than it's worth." He stated that "the Board voted for an amendment to our zoning and our representative (Vice-Chair McNeil) voted against the Boards' decision" (and therefore not in accordance with the Boards' decision). Supervisor Dunphy stated he agrees with regional planning but feels our township would be better served working within our school district and not Phoenixville and Great Valley's School Districts. He doesn't feel we should allow Phoenixville and Charlestown Townships to dictate our planning. He stated that "the TDR issue is complex and when you talk about any use in the township you have to keep in mind you can't do density without TDR's. This is not just about a CCRC issue." Vice-Chair McNeil said the only townships included in the Pottstown Regional Plan are East Coventry and North Coventry. She feels we've spent eight years on the Phoenixville Regional Plan and since it's in Chester County we should stay with it. She also said that the Phoenixville Regional Planning Commission is not against a CCRC in East Vincent Township but would like to see it in the mixed-use district. Vice-Chair McNeil also stated that regional TDR's may soon be an option. This means TDR's can transfer from one municipality to another. In other words, development can be sent from one township to the other. Presently, as one IEVR stated, East Vincent Township appears to have the most available mixed-use, commercial and industrial lands available in the entire Phoenixville Planning Region.
In regard to the CCRC issue, IEVR would like to remind the readers that the land known as the Latshaw tract is in a sending area for TDR's. Therefore, the owner of this land (who initially wanted a CCRC on the Latshaw tract---and Mrs. McNeil felt was a "worth looking into," and IEVR would like to stress that this area is in a sending area and the Stoney Run Watershed), can buy TDR's from the township if he so chooses and then send the development to a receiving area. The size of the development will depend on how many TDR's are available to the developer. Presently, East Vincent Township has not retired the TDR's but is "banking" them. Simply put, the more you have in the "bank," the more opportunity for development north of the PECO power lines where the receiving areas exist. Supervisor Dunphy has repeatedly stated he would like the Board of Supervisors' and Planning Commission to look at our zoning in a holistic way, along with the Rt. 724 Corridor and TDR's, to determine the best approach to development in our township. He would like our residents and appointed/elected officials to make this determination; not just an outside advisory board such as the Phoenixville Regional Plan.
Ms. Flagg stated that there is virtually no revenue from development in the long run; to educate costs more money than a homeowner pays in taxes to the township. Single-family homes raise costs and raise taxes. The question is how can East Vincent Township mitigate the contribution to the Owen J. Roberts School District (for the taxpayer)?
A resident from West Bridge Street requested that the Board "look at all the unintended consequences of certain development and make sure the Township gets the type of revenue it's looking for."
Chairman Funk and Supervisor Dunphy voted "no" to spending $4,500 of taxpayer dollars for a Master Plan with East Coventry for the Schuylkill River Heritage Trail area. Vice-Chair McNeil feels we can get a PECO Green Energy Grant to offset costs. Chairman Funk feels the County should take the lead in this and Supervisor Dunphy stated that "we already have our hands full. We have the Reiff Park to plan for, and the 82 acres at Pennhurst to plan for, so let's finish what we have before spending more money on another plan."
The request for $1,000 donation to French and Pickering Creek is under advisement at this time.
Chief Demski reported there were two burglaries in the area; one in Barton Meadows and another on Brownback's Church Road. It's possible these homes were targeted specifically. The suspect is known but has not been found. In a separate incident, a burglar who broke into a home on Clover Hill Road, was caught.
During Public Comment, one resident mentioned that the Memorial at Pennhurst looks nice. He also asked what kind of camera was used to take the photos of the restoration of the Parkerford Tavern. He felt the cost of the pictures at $1,100 was a lot of money for what the Township received.
Please feel free to contact us with any questions you may have about any proposals or issues affecting our township.
Thank You and Have A Nice day,
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Congratulations Supervisor Dunphy and East Vincent Township Board of Supervisors' Meeting, TONIGHT, Wednesday November 4, 2009 at 7:30 P.M.
There will be a Public Hearing on the proposed zoning amendment to allow for a composting facility previous to the regular Board of Supervisors' Meeting.
To view this evenings agenda, go to www.eastvincent.org and click on Current Agenda.
We would also like to extend our congratulations to Supervisor Mark Dunphy for winning the election and retaining his seat as one of our Board of Supervisors. Congratulations Supervisor Dunphy!
Thank You and Have a Nice Day!
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
To view this evenings agenda, go to www.eastvincent.org and click on Current Agenda.
We would also like to extend our congratulations to Supervisor Mark Dunphy for winning the election and retaining his seat as one of our Board of Supervisors. Congratulations Supervisor Dunphy!
Thank You and Have a Nice Day!
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
Thursday, October 15, 2009
Update: Board of Supervisors' Meeting October 7, 2009
At the last Board of Supervisors' meeting, a Keen Road resident thanked the Board for repairing her road but questioned why the oil and chip method was used. Vice-Chair McNeil stated that "we receive a small amount of money from the state and oil and chip is used to extend the life of the road. It's common practice to oil and chip. It's the best that can be done with the measly allocation given."
The Informed East Vincent Residents would like to note at this time that we have received information that the Parker Ford Tavern Roof project is $39,391.56 over the original estimated project budget. This brings the total cost of the roof and cornice restoration project for the tavern and its kitchen wing to a grand total of $245,426.56. The explanation for these additional costs include tree removal, additional administrative costs not conveyed in the report we received and the two change orders to rebuild the west chimney and repair framing approved by Chairman Funk and Vice-Chair McNeil. Preservation of the Parkerford Tavern is a worthy cause and one that is consistent with our Township's Comprehensive Plan, but, quality road repair would also seem to be a worthwhile use of taxpayer dollars also.
Chief Demski noted that serious crimes are down, however, Honda vehicles have become the target of thieves so please remember to lock up your vehicle---especially Hondas.
Vice-Chair McNeil said the Northern Federation, which is made up of 9 municipalities, will be sending a regional survey to all households. The results should be out in the later part of this year.
Ordinance 200, Chapter 15, Part 2 15-201 amending Code regarding maximum speed limits and stop intersections, was approved. Signs have been put up on Old Schuylkill Road and Brown Drive, a yield sign at Reitnoir Road and Stoney Run Development has a three-way stop sign so families can safely walk to the playground. Pikeland Avenue now has the ordinance to enforce the speed limit.
Saul Rivkin of the Historic Commission spoke about the Historic Inventory Plan. He said Phase I of the plan would be to make contact with residents who have historic properties and create a file for each property. Supervisor Dunphy asked what Phase II would entail? Mr. Dunphy said "homeowners would like to know what you're going to do with this data." Mr. Rivkin said the "objective is not to dictate (to historic home owners)." Supervisor Dunphy, who lives in an historic home himself, offered to share data with the Historical Commission about his home. Mr. Rivkin also mentioned an upcoming program called "What is Historic Preservation?" This is to be a free event open to the public and will be announced. The Informed East Vincent Residents recall a past historic preservation open house which focused on rallying support to Preserve Pennhurst. Mr. Rivkin assured the residents last year (who expressed concern about the cost of last year's Open House and Art Exhibit and who were in attendance at the following Board of Supervisors' meeting in Oct. 2008), that all the food and beverages were donated by the Historical Commission and taxpayer dollars were not used (above what the commission has in it's allocated budget). He said he donated cookies, Elaine Husted donated brownies and lemonade, and so on. The IEVR however have documentation showing requests for reimbursement by Mr. Rivkin, Mrs. Husted and others to get their personal monies back for these "donated" refreshments and advertising costs. The East Vincent Taxpayer did provide the food, drink and advertising for the Open House and Art Exhibit dated September 12, 2008, held at the Ridge Fire Company, whether it was in the budget or not. Why say items were donated if you then ask the taxpayer to give you the money back?
East Vincent Township, utilizing the Open Space Bond Referendum and purchasing 25 (out of 26) Transfer of Development Rights, bought the Rodriguez Property, located on Seven Stars Road, for $817,300. This property is now reserved for open space and is forever deed restricted. Since this property is not on the present open space map, the acquisition will go to the Planning Commission then to the Board of Supervisors for a Public Hearing in November. A Windgate resident, commenting on Vice-Chair McNeil's comment that TDR's can be "retired, returned, held, etc." asked why the Township isn't just retiring the TDR's (and therefore limiting development). Township Solicitor Cohen said the Township is not required to. The TDR's can transfer to receiving areas (which in north of the PECO lines). Taxes paid to purchase Open Space and TDR's are not limiting development but are transferring development; such as with the Reiff Tract case." The Informed East Vincent Residents would like to note that ALL of our residents pay taxes toward the Open Space Bond Referendum, yet, if you live north of the PECO lines, only receiving areas for TDR's exist, so there will be no open space money used north of the PECO lines to preserve open space. Keep in mind too the Transfer of Development Rights/Open Space Design Option utilizing the Bonus Residential Density Multiplier Ordinance Amendment. This TDR/OSDO/ RDM Ordinance Amendment is meant to CREATE receiving areas north of the PECO lines so to increase density north of the PECO lines and preserve property in other areas of the township. This presently tabled Ordinance Amendment was approved to go forward to the Board of Supervisors (for approval) by Planning Commission members Lester Schwartz and Elaine Milito (Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 15, 2008). Also see the post on this blog dated August 6, 2008. The impact of this Ordinance Amendment will be felt both north and south of the power lines through higher school taxes, traffic increase, etc.
One West Bridge Street resident asked that a meeting be held with the Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission to discuss a potential site for the Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC). This may be brought up at the next Planning Commission meeting on October 20. Another resident spoke of her concerns with speeding on West Bridge Street.
Supervisor Dunphy would like to look at the CCRC Ordinance, Zoning and the Route 724 Corridor in a holistic way. He would like the Planning Commission and Board to look at the big picture. He would also like to see the PO and GI districts (located on West Bridge Street, Stoney Run Road and Route 724) addressed. Vice-Chair McNeil stated that the current CCRC Ordinance, which is located in the Light Residential District and NORTH of the PECO lines, is "out of the growth zone". IEVR recall last year when Mrs. McNeil felt a CCRC on the Latshaw property was worth looking into. The Latshaw property is in the Stoney Run Watershed, south of the PECO lines and in the Rural Conservation District.
Residents located near the SFYAL ball fields asked about the status of the road closure near their homes. Vice-Chair McNeil addressed EVT Manager Ms. Flagg about what has been done. Ms. Flagg redirected the question back to Mrs. McNeil as Mrs. McNeil has been personally dealing with Scott Smiley of the SFYAL. Vice-Chair McNeil didn't address the comment other than to say she is allowed to speak with residents. Mr. Smiley is not a resident of East Vincent Township and yet EVT (Ms. Flagg and April Baraski, our township engineer) has bent over backwards to help him accomplish the goal of getting the lot line change and a driveway waiver. The impression IEVR's get is that Vice-Chair McNeil began to personally deal with Mr. Smiley during all of this and therefore there were "too many cooks in the kitchen", so to speak. Jim Burns of the Spring City Planning Commission stated that Spring City was committed to dealing with this issue. Supervisor Dunphy restated that "if this issue isn't addressed by next season, there will be no ball. It's time for the adults to step up to the plate and get this resolved." Mr. Dunphy mentioned safety issues of having almost 400 cars coming and going with only one way out. He wants the East Vincent Manager, Spring City Manager and Spring-Ford School District to address this situation and for everyone else to sit back and let these three do their job. Other issues revolving around this area involve homeowners pulling out the no parking signs and police jurisdiction at the ball field as a father and son who live near the ball field were verbally assaulted.
A resident also asked what can be done about an abandoned property on Broad and New Street. Ms. Flagg will address this.
Saul Rivkin asked if there is a procedure to cancellation of meetings. Solicitor Cohen said "no." The property owner made the request for the meeting, paid for it and had to cancel.
The Informed East Vincent Residents would like to thank all of you for your kind words of support and for taking the time to stay informed.
Please continue to feel free to contact us with any questions or concerns you may have about issues and proposals affecting our township.
Thank you and have a nice day!
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
The Informed East Vincent Residents would like to note at this time that we have received information that the Parker Ford Tavern Roof project is $39,391.56 over the original estimated project budget. This brings the total cost of the roof and cornice restoration project for the tavern and its kitchen wing to a grand total of $245,426.56. The explanation for these additional costs include tree removal, additional administrative costs not conveyed in the report we received and the two change orders to rebuild the west chimney and repair framing approved by Chairman Funk and Vice-Chair McNeil. Preservation of the Parkerford Tavern is a worthy cause and one that is consistent with our Township's Comprehensive Plan, but, quality road repair would also seem to be a worthwhile use of taxpayer dollars also.
Chief Demski noted that serious crimes are down, however, Honda vehicles have become the target of thieves so please remember to lock up your vehicle---especially Hondas.
Vice-Chair McNeil said the Northern Federation, which is made up of 9 municipalities, will be sending a regional survey to all households. The results should be out in the later part of this year.
Ordinance 200, Chapter 15, Part 2 15-201 amending Code regarding maximum speed limits and stop intersections, was approved. Signs have been put up on Old Schuylkill Road and Brown Drive, a yield sign at Reitnoir Road and Stoney Run Development has a three-way stop sign so families can safely walk to the playground. Pikeland Avenue now has the ordinance to enforce the speed limit.
Saul Rivkin of the Historic Commission spoke about the Historic Inventory Plan. He said Phase I of the plan would be to make contact with residents who have historic properties and create a file for each property. Supervisor Dunphy asked what Phase II would entail? Mr. Dunphy said "homeowners would like to know what you're going to do with this data." Mr. Rivkin said the "objective is not to dictate (to historic home owners)." Supervisor Dunphy, who lives in an historic home himself, offered to share data with the Historical Commission about his home. Mr. Rivkin also mentioned an upcoming program called "What is Historic Preservation?" This is to be a free event open to the public and will be announced. The Informed East Vincent Residents recall a past historic preservation open house which focused on rallying support to Preserve Pennhurst. Mr. Rivkin assured the residents last year (who expressed concern about the cost of last year's Open House and Art Exhibit and who were in attendance at the following Board of Supervisors' meeting in Oct. 2008), that all the food and beverages were donated by the Historical Commission and taxpayer dollars were not used (above what the commission has in it's allocated budget). He said he donated cookies, Elaine Husted donated brownies and lemonade, and so on. The IEVR however have documentation showing requests for reimbursement by Mr. Rivkin, Mrs. Husted and others to get their personal monies back for these "donated" refreshments and advertising costs. The East Vincent Taxpayer did provide the food, drink and advertising for the Open House and Art Exhibit dated September 12, 2008, held at the Ridge Fire Company, whether it was in the budget or not. Why say items were donated if you then ask the taxpayer to give you the money back?
East Vincent Township, utilizing the Open Space Bond Referendum and purchasing 25 (out of 26) Transfer of Development Rights, bought the Rodriguez Property, located on Seven Stars Road, for $817,300. This property is now reserved for open space and is forever deed restricted. Since this property is not on the present open space map, the acquisition will go to the Planning Commission then to the Board of Supervisors for a Public Hearing in November. A Windgate resident, commenting on Vice-Chair McNeil's comment that TDR's can be "retired, returned, held, etc." asked why the Township isn't just retiring the TDR's (and therefore limiting development). Township Solicitor Cohen said the Township is not required to. The TDR's can transfer to receiving areas (which in north of the PECO lines). Taxes paid to purchase Open Space and TDR's are not limiting development but are transferring development; such as with the Reiff Tract case." The Informed East Vincent Residents would like to note that ALL of our residents pay taxes toward the Open Space Bond Referendum, yet, if you live north of the PECO lines, only receiving areas for TDR's exist, so there will be no open space money used north of the PECO lines to preserve open space. Keep in mind too the Transfer of Development Rights/Open Space Design Option utilizing the Bonus Residential Density Multiplier Ordinance Amendment. This TDR/OSDO/ RDM Ordinance Amendment is meant to CREATE receiving areas north of the PECO lines so to increase density north of the PECO lines and preserve property in other areas of the township. This presently tabled Ordinance Amendment was approved to go forward to the Board of Supervisors (for approval) by Planning Commission members Lester Schwartz and Elaine Milito (Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 15, 2008). Also see the post on this blog dated August 6, 2008. The impact of this Ordinance Amendment will be felt both north and south of the power lines through higher school taxes, traffic increase, etc.
One West Bridge Street resident asked that a meeting be held with the Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission to discuss a potential site for the Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC). This may be brought up at the next Planning Commission meeting on October 20. Another resident spoke of her concerns with speeding on West Bridge Street.
Supervisor Dunphy would like to look at the CCRC Ordinance, Zoning and the Route 724 Corridor in a holistic way. He would like the Planning Commission and Board to look at the big picture. He would also like to see the PO and GI districts (located on West Bridge Street, Stoney Run Road and Route 724) addressed. Vice-Chair McNeil stated that the current CCRC Ordinance, which is located in the Light Residential District and NORTH of the PECO lines, is "out of the growth zone". IEVR recall last year when Mrs. McNeil felt a CCRC on the Latshaw property was worth looking into. The Latshaw property is in the Stoney Run Watershed, south of the PECO lines and in the Rural Conservation District.
Residents located near the SFYAL ball fields asked about the status of the road closure near their homes. Vice-Chair McNeil addressed EVT Manager Ms. Flagg about what has been done. Ms. Flagg redirected the question back to Mrs. McNeil as Mrs. McNeil has been personally dealing with Scott Smiley of the SFYAL. Vice-Chair McNeil didn't address the comment other than to say she is allowed to speak with residents. Mr. Smiley is not a resident of East Vincent Township and yet EVT (Ms. Flagg and April Baraski, our township engineer) has bent over backwards to help him accomplish the goal of getting the lot line change and a driveway waiver. The impression IEVR's get is that Vice-Chair McNeil began to personally deal with Mr. Smiley during all of this and therefore there were "too many cooks in the kitchen", so to speak. Jim Burns of the Spring City Planning Commission stated that Spring City was committed to dealing with this issue. Supervisor Dunphy restated that "if this issue isn't addressed by next season, there will be no ball. It's time for the adults to step up to the plate and get this resolved." Mr. Dunphy mentioned safety issues of having almost 400 cars coming and going with only one way out. He wants the East Vincent Manager, Spring City Manager and Spring-Ford School District to address this situation and for everyone else to sit back and let these three do their job. Other issues revolving around this area involve homeowners pulling out the no parking signs and police jurisdiction at the ball field as a father and son who live near the ball field were verbally assaulted.
A resident also asked what can be done about an abandoned property on Broad and New Street. Ms. Flagg will address this.
Saul Rivkin asked if there is a procedure to cancellation of meetings. Solicitor Cohen said "no." The property owner made the request for the meeting, paid for it and had to cancel.
The Informed East Vincent Residents would like to thank all of you for your kind words of support and for taking the time to stay informed.
Please continue to feel free to contact us with any questions or concerns you may have about issues and proposals affecting our township.
Thank you and have a nice day!
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
Monday, October 12, 2009
John Carnes, Jr. Esq. and Elaine Milito Put the Informed East Vincent Residents Group "On Notice."
Please find below the e-mail sent to one of the Informed East Vincent Residents by John Carnes, Jr. the Democrat Solicitor, on behalf of Elaine Milito; the Democrat candidate for East Vincent Township Board of Supervisors
-----Original Message-----From: John S Carnes <jcarnes@jcatty.com
Subject: Elaine Milito - CCOEV
Dear Ms. Peronteau: I am the solicitor for the Democratic Party. I am supplying you with a letter that has been mailed to you. John S. Carnes, Jr. , Esquire 320 N. High StreetSuite 103West Chester, PA 19382v. 610.436.7500f. 610.436.7501jcarnes@jcatty.com
Elaine_Milito_-_Peronteau_letter.pdf79K View Download
Please check your inbox for a separate mailing containing the attachment to Solicitor John S. Carne's, Jr. letter on behalf of Democrat Candidate Elaine Milito.
As a result of a threatening letter from Elaine Milito's solicitor, John S. Carnes, Jr., the Informed East Vincent Residents Group is being told to amend the statement "Elaine Milito spent CCOEV's money on Elaine Husted's campaign," and state that "no CCOEV money was used by Elaine Milito on Elaine Husted's campaign," (although we do not have documentation proving this statement). According to Solicitor Carnes, Jr., Elaine Milito used her own personal money to host the website for her opponent Elaine Husted during the primary campaign and CCOEV is only listed as the registrant because Elaine Milito "inadvertently failed" (her attorney's words-not ours) to remove the CCOEV reference. Please note Elaine Milito (D) ADMITS to using her own personal money to host the website for her opponent Elaine Husted (R) in the primary. Elaine Husted is now Elaine Milito's treasurer in the present campaign. Christine McNeil is listed as the Chair of Elaine Milito's campaign.
Solicitor Carnes, Jr. states in his letter "most importantly, no CCOEV funds have been used for this hosting site or any domain names, a fact that can be proven." We challenge Solicitor Carnes, Jr. and Elaine Milito to provide us with a listing of CCOEV expenses from the last two years. PROVE to us that no CCOEV money was used--- as you have stated.
Attorney Carnes, Jr. has warned the Informed East Vincent Residents not to make any "false and defamatory statements regarding the use of CCOEV funds for political purposes." The undeniable registrant for the domain site is CCOEV. The IEVR group is not responsible for Elaine Milito's "inadvertent failure" to remove the CCOEV as the registrant, not just one time, or two times, but a total of three times.
Elaine Milito's "inadvertent failure" brings into question her ability to lead. If Mrs. Milito is incapable of changing the registrant name for the account, three different times, what makes her capable of making decisions for our residents and our township? Who will she blame when she "inadvertently fails" again? Will contacting another solicitor be part of her plan? Also, as a result of her "inadvertent failure" to remove the CCOEV registrant information, is it possible that CCOEV ends up in litigation of it's own due to this "inadvertent failure?" Finally, one should question Elaine Milito's choice for solicitor to represent her. John S. Carnes, Jr., as Coatesville's solicitor, attempted to use eminent domain to take away a family farm. See http://www.saveourfarm.com/ for more information on the Saha case.
Elaine Milito seems to be the champion of saving land. Why would she hire an attorney who fought to take private land away from a family for public use? Why would Elaine Milito condone increasing our own township residential build-out 48 % (in the least) above and beyond what all the advisory boards (Phoenixville Regional Plan and Chester County Planning Commission) suggest and all north of the power lines only (see Aug. 6,2008 blog post)?
Might we suggest that Elaine Milito invest her time and energy sharing with the residents of our township what she has planned for us? What can she do for the residents of East Vincent Township other than investing her energy and time threatening a local resident and group who merely reported on a document on which SHE and her attorney admit she made a "mistake."
Based upon Solicitor Carne's, Jr. representation for Elaine Milito, we have made amends to the statement as noted above, however, we will continue to inform our residents about vital issues affecting our township. We will not be bullied. We feel this letter from Elaine Milito's Democrat Party solicitor is meant to stop political discussion and silence any dissenting viewpoints other residents may have. Again, The IEVR group is made up of Democrats, Republicans and Independents who came together to stop the Residential Bonus Density Multiplier. We have continued to attend meetings so that our residents can have a voice in decisions made in this township; decisions made by our elected and appointed officials. This blog will continue to present facts and allow our readers to draw their own conclusions and won't be silenced by threatening letters.
Finally, we would like to leave our readers with an e-mail sent to IEVR by Elaine Milito, president of CCOEV, welcoming us into the arena of informing East Vincent Township residents back in August of 2008:
----- Forwarded Message -----From: "Elaine Milito" <emilito1@comcast.net>To: informedeastvincentresidents@comcast.netSent: Friday, August 8, 2008 8:15:36 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada EasternSubject: Don't hide!
I attach no significance to people who don’t say who they are. –Elaine Milito
Our guess is that we have become significant enough to be threatened by you and your attorney Mrs. Elaine Milito.
Thank you to all of our residents who take the time to read this blog, stay informed and challenge your appointed, elected and campaigning officials! Please continue to share this blog with your friends and neighbors and let us know if you have any questions.
Thank you and have a nice day!
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
-----Original Message-----From: John S Carnes <jcarnes@jcatty.com
Subject: Elaine Milito - CCOEV
Dear Ms. Peronteau: I am the solicitor for the Democratic Party. I am supplying you with a letter that has been mailed to you. John S. Carnes, Jr. , Esquire 320 N. High StreetSuite 103West Chester, PA 19382v. 610.436.7500f. 610.436.7501jcarnes@jcatty.com
Elaine_Milito_-_Peronteau_letter.pdf79K View Download
Please check your inbox for a separate mailing containing the attachment to Solicitor John S. Carne's, Jr. letter on behalf of Democrat Candidate Elaine Milito.
As a result of a threatening letter from Elaine Milito's solicitor, John S. Carnes, Jr., the Informed East Vincent Residents Group is being told to amend the statement "Elaine Milito spent CCOEV's money on Elaine Husted's campaign," and state that "no CCOEV money was used by Elaine Milito on Elaine Husted's campaign," (although we do not have documentation proving this statement). According to Solicitor Carnes, Jr., Elaine Milito used her own personal money to host the website for her opponent Elaine Husted during the primary campaign and CCOEV is only listed as the registrant because Elaine Milito "inadvertently failed" (her attorney's words-not ours) to remove the CCOEV reference. Please note Elaine Milito (D) ADMITS to using her own personal money to host the website for her opponent Elaine Husted (R) in the primary. Elaine Husted is now Elaine Milito's treasurer in the present campaign. Christine McNeil is listed as the Chair of Elaine Milito's campaign.
Solicitor Carnes, Jr. states in his letter "most importantly, no CCOEV funds have been used for this hosting site or any domain names, a fact that can be proven." We challenge Solicitor Carnes, Jr. and Elaine Milito to provide us with a listing of CCOEV expenses from the last two years. PROVE to us that no CCOEV money was used--- as you have stated.
Attorney Carnes, Jr. has warned the Informed East Vincent Residents not to make any "false and defamatory statements regarding the use of CCOEV funds for political purposes." The undeniable registrant for the domain site is CCOEV. The IEVR group is not responsible for Elaine Milito's "inadvertent failure" to remove the CCOEV as the registrant, not just one time, or two times, but a total of three times.
Elaine Milito's "inadvertent failure" brings into question her ability to lead. If Mrs. Milito is incapable of changing the registrant name for the account, three different times, what makes her capable of making decisions for our residents and our township? Who will she blame when she "inadvertently fails" again? Will contacting another solicitor be part of her plan? Also, as a result of her "inadvertent failure" to remove the CCOEV registrant information, is it possible that CCOEV ends up in litigation of it's own due to this "inadvertent failure?" Finally, one should question Elaine Milito's choice for solicitor to represent her. John S. Carnes, Jr., as Coatesville's solicitor, attempted to use eminent domain to take away a family farm. See http://www.saveourfarm.com/ for more information on the Saha case.
Elaine Milito seems to be the champion of saving land. Why would she hire an attorney who fought to take private land away from a family for public use? Why would Elaine Milito condone increasing our own township residential build-out 48 % (in the least) above and beyond what all the advisory boards (Phoenixville Regional Plan and Chester County Planning Commission) suggest and all north of the power lines only (see Aug. 6,2008 blog post)?
Might we suggest that Elaine Milito invest her time and energy sharing with the residents of our township what she has planned for us? What can she do for the residents of East Vincent Township other than investing her energy and time threatening a local resident and group who merely reported on a document on which SHE and her attorney admit she made a "mistake."
Based upon Solicitor Carne's, Jr. representation for Elaine Milito, we have made amends to the statement as noted above, however, we will continue to inform our residents about vital issues affecting our township. We will not be bullied. We feel this letter from Elaine Milito's Democrat Party solicitor is meant to stop political discussion and silence any dissenting viewpoints other residents may have. Again, The IEVR group is made up of Democrats, Republicans and Independents who came together to stop the Residential Bonus Density Multiplier. We have continued to attend meetings so that our residents can have a voice in decisions made in this township; decisions made by our elected and appointed officials. This blog will continue to present facts and allow our readers to draw their own conclusions and won't be silenced by threatening letters.
Finally, we would like to leave our readers with an e-mail sent to IEVR by Elaine Milito, president of CCOEV, welcoming us into the arena of informing East Vincent Township residents back in August of 2008:
----- Forwarded Message -----From: "Elaine Milito" <emilito1@comcast.net>To: informedeastvincentresidents@comcast.netSent: Friday, August 8, 2008 8:15:36 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada EasternSubject: Don't hide!
I attach no significance to people who don’t say who they are. –Elaine Milito
Our guess is that we have become significant enough to be threatened by you and your attorney Mrs. Elaine Milito.
Thank you to all of our residents who take the time to read this blog, stay informed and challenge your appointed, elected and campaigning officials! Please continue to share this blog with your friends and neighbors and let us know if you have any questions.
Thank you and have a nice day!
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
Monday, October 5, 2009
East Vincent Township Board of Supervisors' Meeting, This Wednesday, October 7, 2009 at 7:30 P.M.
The East Vincent Township Board of Supervisors' Meeting is scheduled for this Wednesday, October 7 at 7:30 p.m. in the East Vincent Township Municipal Building located at 262 Ridge Road.
The Agenda for this meeting is as follows:
EAST VINCENT TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
October 7, 2009
Call To Order: Chairman John Funk
AGENDA:
1. Minutes of September 2, 2009
2. Financial Reports:
Bills Listed for Approval
August Financials / Fund Report / Balance Sheets
Tax Collector’s Report (August)
3. August Reports:
Police Report
Fire Company / Ambulance Report
Code Enforcement Officer’s Report
4. Supervisors’ Reports:
5. Ordinances:
Ordinance #200 – amending Code regarding maximum speed limits and stop intersections
Ordinance regarding attorney’s fees for collection matters -- motion to advertise
6. Other Matters:
Historic Inventory Plan
Appointment to Park & Recreation Board
Open Space Acquisition
7. Correspondence:
French & Pickering Creeks Conservation Trust, seeking donation
Chester County Planning Commission, review of Phoenixville Regional Comprehensive Plan
Consistency Review
8. Minutes:
Environmental Advisory Council: Minutes of June 2
Historical Commission: Minutes of August 12 and September 9
Park & Recreation Board: Notes of August 25 and September 22
9. **PUBLIC COMMENT**
10. Release:
Vincent Meadows, Release #8
11. Announcement: Computer Recycling Event scheduled for Saturday, October 17, 8 – noon.
Sponsored by the Environmental Advisory Board. Small electronics also accepted.
Adjourn
Please feel free to contact us with any questions or concerns you may have pertaining to issues and/or proposals affecting our township.
Thank You and Have A Nice Day,
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
The Agenda for this meeting is as follows:
EAST VINCENT TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
October 7, 2009
Call To Order: Chairman John Funk
AGENDA:
1. Minutes of September 2, 2009
2. Financial Reports:
Bills Listed for Approval
August Financials / Fund Report / Balance Sheets
Tax Collector’s Report (August)
3. August Reports:
Police Report
Fire Company / Ambulance Report
Code Enforcement Officer’s Report
4. Supervisors’ Reports:
5. Ordinances:
Ordinance #200 – amending Code regarding maximum speed limits and stop intersections
Ordinance regarding attorney’s fees for collection matters -- motion to advertise
6. Other Matters:
Historic Inventory Plan
Appointment to Park & Recreation Board
Open Space Acquisition
7. Correspondence:
French & Pickering Creeks Conservation Trust, seeking donation
Chester County Planning Commission, review of Phoenixville Regional Comprehensive Plan
Consistency Review
8. Minutes:
Environmental Advisory Council: Minutes of June 2
Historical Commission: Minutes of August 12 and September 9
Park & Recreation Board: Notes of August 25 and September 22
9. **PUBLIC COMMENT**
10. Release:
Vincent Meadows, Release #8
11. Announcement: Computer Recycling Event scheduled for Saturday, October 17, 8 – noon.
Sponsored by the Environmental Advisory Board. Small electronics also accepted.
Adjourn
Please feel free to contact us with any questions or concerns you may have pertaining to issues and/or proposals affecting our township.
Thank You and Have A Nice Day,
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
Monday, September 14, 2009
East Vincent Township Planning Commission Meeting, TOMORROW, Tuesday September 15, 2008 at 7:00 P.M.
The East Vincent Township Planning Commission Meeting is scheduled for tomorrow, Tuesday September 15 at 7:00 p.m., in the East Vincent Township Municipal Building located at 262 Ridge Road.
The Agenda is as follows:
EAST VINCENT TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 15, 2009
Meeting to Order at 7:00 pm: Michele Adams, Chair
Agenda/Index:
1. Minutes of August 18, 2009
2. Subdivision & Land Development:
A. [07-305] Camphill Special School – Beaver Farm, recommendation for final approval
B. [09-309] Spring City Church of God – recommendation for preliminary/final approval
3. Old Business:
A. 724 Corridor
B. Zoning Amendments
C. TDR’s
D. Open Space Design Option
4. ** Public Comment **
5. Minutes:
A. Environmental Advisory Council: Minutes of June 2009
B. Historical Commission: Minutes of August 12, 2009
C. Municipal Authority: Minutes of August 13, 2009
Adjourn
Thank you and Have A Nice Day,
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
The Agenda is as follows:
EAST VINCENT TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 15, 2009
Meeting to Order at 7:00 pm: Michele Adams, Chair
Agenda/Index:
1. Minutes of August 18, 2009
2. Subdivision & Land Development:
A. [07-305] Camphill Special School – Beaver Farm, recommendation for final approval
B. [09-309] Spring City Church of God – recommendation for preliminary/final approval
3. Old Business:
A. 724 Corridor
B. Zoning Amendments
C. TDR’s
D. Open Space Design Option
4. ** Public Comment **
5. Minutes:
A. Environmental Advisory Council: Minutes of June 2009
B. Historical Commission: Minutes of August 12, 2009
C. Municipal Authority: Minutes of August 13, 2009
Adjourn
Thank you and Have A Nice Day,
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
Monday, August 31, 2009
East Vincent Township Board of Supervisors' Meeting, Wednesday, September 2 at 7:30 P.M.
The East Vincent Township Board of Supervisors' Meeting is scheduled for this Wednesday, September 2 at 7:30 p.m. in the East Vincent Township Municipal Building located at 262 Ridge Road.
The current agenda can be viewed by clicking on the following link:
http://www.eastvincent.org/vertical/Sites/%7B5B8F1E55-6CA8-450E-BB40-12A8385B1313%7D/uploads/%7B1B3AF391-EDD9-4FF4-AEA5-E65F6D5EB03E%7D.PDF
The Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC) Ordinance Amendment Proposal has gone through the proper advisory boards of the Chester County Planning Commission and the Phoenixville Regional Planning Commission. The transparent discussion about the recommendations from these Advisory Boards will now proceed to the Board of Supervisors.
Thank You and Have a Nice Day!
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
The current agenda can be viewed by clicking on the following link:
http://www.eastvincent.org/vertical/Sites/%7B5B8F1E55-6CA8-450E-BB40-12A8385B1313%7D/uploads/%7B1B3AF391-EDD9-4FF4-AEA5-E65F6D5EB03E%7D.PDF
The Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC) Ordinance Amendment Proposal has gone through the proper advisory boards of the Chester County Planning Commission and the Phoenixville Regional Planning Commission. The transparent discussion about the recommendations from these Advisory Boards will now proceed to the Board of Supervisors.
Thank You and Have a Nice Day!
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
Update: East Vincent Township Planning Commission Meeting, August 18, 2009
Last evening, a representative of the Springford Youth Athletic League presented a plan which demonstrated the lot line change welcomed by the Spring-Ford School District. This lot line change will allow the property already utilized by the Springford Youth Athletic League to be ceded to the Borough of Spring City. This ceding of the property to the Borough and SFYAL will allow for a driveway off Wall Street therefore eliminating the existing driveway to the fields and the issues which have transpired as a result of that existing driveway; such as speeding and dust which were affecting the properties situated near this entrance. April Barkasi, East Vincent Township Engineer stated that the presentation is not complete and the Planning Commission therefore could not approve the plan at this time. The representative also mentioned that SFYAL would like to put Musco Sport Lighting at the facility. He stated there are seven light posts which would be utilized and that these particular lights do not spill into neighboring areas. Vandalism at the SFYAL property was addressed and the league would like those who witness these acts to contact the local authorities. A Land Use Application would need to be completed before lighting can be addressed.
The Planning Commission received letters from the Phoenixville Regional Plan, the Chester County Regional Plan and from Jim McMaster, the attorney for the Phoenixville Regional Planning Commission about the proposed zoning ordinance for a continuing care retirement community (ccrc). Issues consistent with all of the advisory boards' recommendations, according to Planning Commission member Todd Bereda include concerns regarding the height of the building, how the building is situated, where the building is situated, density, etc.
Planning Commission member Lawson McCartney mentioned the Chester County Planning Commission concern about the risk to the township and what kind of precedent would be set by adopting this ordinance.
Jason Herron questioned if the "fee in lieu of taxes" agreement is enforceable. Ray Ott, East Vincent Township Planner said he's never personally seen this but it could be negotiated as part of the conditional use. It was also stated that the proposed zoning ordinance in question did not make mention of a one-time fee. Mr. Herron stated that unless there is an economic advantage to the township, there should be less density.
Elaine Milito expressed concerns about the density coming into the township. Dr. Milito stated that "East Vincent already has the assisted living facilities zoned in the township even though the component is not a specific ccrc amendment." She raised concerns as to why this proposed ordinance was never brought before the Planning Commission or why Ray Ott didn't present this to the Planning Commission. According to Mr. Bereda, this did not need to happen as the proper procedure was followed. Dr. Milito said the proposed ccrc amendment is not coming from a developer but from Ray Ott and Stu Cohen and these two need to address the concerns from the Phoenixville Regional Planning Commission and the Chester County Planning Commission. Dr. Milito suggested this proposed zoning ordinance be tabled, an analysis done and to craft it (the ccrc ordinance) to have the ccrc part of the Route 724 corridor where, in the event she were to move into this continuing care retirement community she would be able to walk, shop and go to nice restaurants because the ccrc is centrally located. Dr. Milito also suggested placing the ccrc in the PO and/or GI districts. These districts are located between West Bridge Street and Stoney Run Road and between Stoney Run Road and Route 724. Dr. Milito also said our township's buildout projection is now 376 units by 2030; much less than the published Phoenixville Regional Plan. Planner Ray Ott said the projected buildout (no. of homes/units to be built to maximum capacity in the township) is in the 1,000 unit projection and he did not know where the discrepancy comes from (1,096 to 376). He has not seen this new buildout projection.
Lester Schwartz also mentioned the recommendations from the Kise, Straw and Koldner, Inc., Urban Partners (KSK). KSK were responsible for providing data on the potential development for buildout in the region---including East Vincent Township. Dr. Schwartz stated there was a "lack of thought about not considering density changes from low to medium and from medium to high density." He stated that "we have low, medium and high density areas and we want to keep the low, medium and high density areas as they are presently in our zoning ordinance." With Dr. Schwartz having said this, The Informed East Vincent Residents would like to remind our fellow residents at this time that the reason this group formed was a direct result of the East Vincent Township Planning Commission---specifically Dr. Schwartz and Dr. Milito--- forwarding to the Board of Supervisors their approval of the Transfer of Development Rights/ Opens Space Design Option Ordinance Amendment proposal utilizing a Residential Density Multiplier (TDR/OSDO/RDM) on July 15, 2008. This TDR/OSDO Ordinance Amendment would have allowed a total buildout of 1,506 units---which included a 48% increase in residential development above and beyond what the Phoenixville Regional Plan (based upon KSK's data) and the Chester County Planning Commission recommended in our township. All of the major residential density would have been located north of the PECO power lines heading toward and beyond Rt. 724. Lester Schwartz and Elaine Milito both approved this motion allowing for an increase in density in order to create receiving areas for developers north of the power lines. Dr. Milito stated at the time that this residential density multiplier "would fix all our problems over the years." This TDR/OSDO Ordinance Amendment utilizing a Residential Density Multiplier would have impacted ALL taxpaying residents in our township, especially through higher school taxes, traffic, etc. Please refer to the August 6, 2008 post for more information.
The comments from the advisory boards and our Planning Commission will be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors where a transparent process in a possible zoning amendment change can occur.
The next Board of Supervisors' meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, September 2 at 7:30 p.m.
Please feel free to contact us with any questions or concerns you may have about proposals and/or issues affecting East Vincent Township.
Thank You and Have A Nice Day!
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
The Planning Commission received letters from the Phoenixville Regional Plan, the Chester County Regional Plan and from Jim McMaster, the attorney for the Phoenixville Regional Planning Commission about the proposed zoning ordinance for a continuing care retirement community (ccrc). Issues consistent with all of the advisory boards' recommendations, according to Planning Commission member Todd Bereda include concerns regarding the height of the building, how the building is situated, where the building is situated, density, etc.
Planning Commission member Lawson McCartney mentioned the Chester County Planning Commission concern about the risk to the township and what kind of precedent would be set by adopting this ordinance.
Jason Herron questioned if the "fee in lieu of taxes" agreement is enforceable. Ray Ott, East Vincent Township Planner said he's never personally seen this but it could be negotiated as part of the conditional use. It was also stated that the proposed zoning ordinance in question did not make mention of a one-time fee. Mr. Herron stated that unless there is an economic advantage to the township, there should be less density.
Elaine Milito expressed concerns about the density coming into the township. Dr. Milito stated that "East Vincent already has the assisted living facilities zoned in the township even though the component is not a specific ccrc amendment." She raised concerns as to why this proposed ordinance was never brought before the Planning Commission or why Ray Ott didn't present this to the Planning Commission. According to Mr. Bereda, this did not need to happen as the proper procedure was followed. Dr. Milito said the proposed ccrc amendment is not coming from a developer but from Ray Ott and Stu Cohen and these two need to address the concerns from the Phoenixville Regional Planning Commission and the Chester County Planning Commission. Dr. Milito suggested this proposed zoning ordinance be tabled, an analysis done and to craft it (the ccrc ordinance) to have the ccrc part of the Route 724 corridor where, in the event she were to move into this continuing care retirement community she would be able to walk, shop and go to nice restaurants because the ccrc is centrally located. Dr. Milito also suggested placing the ccrc in the PO and/or GI districts. These districts are located between West Bridge Street and Stoney Run Road and between Stoney Run Road and Route 724. Dr. Milito also said our township's buildout projection is now 376 units by 2030; much less than the published Phoenixville Regional Plan. Planner Ray Ott said the projected buildout (no. of homes/units to be built to maximum capacity in the township) is in the 1,000 unit projection and he did not know where the discrepancy comes from (1,096 to 376). He has not seen this new buildout projection.
Lester Schwartz also mentioned the recommendations from the Kise, Straw and Koldner, Inc., Urban Partners (KSK). KSK were responsible for providing data on the potential development for buildout in the region---including East Vincent Township. Dr. Schwartz stated there was a "lack of thought about not considering density changes from low to medium and from medium to high density." He stated that "we have low, medium and high density areas and we want to keep the low, medium and high density areas as they are presently in our zoning ordinance." With Dr. Schwartz having said this, The Informed East Vincent Residents would like to remind our fellow residents at this time that the reason this group formed was a direct result of the East Vincent Township Planning Commission---specifically Dr. Schwartz and Dr. Milito--- forwarding to the Board of Supervisors their approval of the Transfer of Development Rights/ Opens Space Design Option Ordinance Amendment proposal utilizing a Residential Density Multiplier (TDR/OSDO/RDM) on July 15, 2008. This TDR/OSDO Ordinance Amendment would have allowed a total buildout of 1,506 units---which included a 48% increase in residential development above and beyond what the Phoenixville Regional Plan (based upon KSK's data) and the Chester County Planning Commission recommended in our township. All of the major residential density would have been located north of the PECO power lines heading toward and beyond Rt. 724. Lester Schwartz and Elaine Milito both approved this motion allowing for an increase in density in order to create receiving areas for developers north of the power lines. Dr. Milito stated at the time that this residential density multiplier "would fix all our problems over the years." This TDR/OSDO Ordinance Amendment utilizing a Residential Density Multiplier would have impacted ALL taxpaying residents in our township, especially through higher school taxes, traffic, etc. Please refer to the August 6, 2008 post for more information.
The comments from the advisory boards and our Planning Commission will be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors where a transparent process in a possible zoning amendment change can occur.
The next Board of Supervisors' meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, September 2 at 7:30 p.m.
Please feel free to contact us with any questions or concerns you may have about proposals and/or issues affecting East Vincent Township.
Thank You and Have A Nice Day!
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
East Vincent Township Planning Commission Meeting TONIGHT, Tuesday August 18 at 7:00 P.M.
The East Vincent Township Planning Commission meeting is tonight, Tuesday August 18 at 7:00 p.m. The meeting is held in the East Vincent Township Municipal Building located at 262 Ridge Road.
To view the current agenda, you may click on the link to the right of this page or go to http://www.eastvincent.org/.
Thank You and Have a Nice day!
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
To view the current agenda, you may click on the link to the right of this page or go to http://www.eastvincent.org/.
Thank You and Have a Nice day!
The Informed East Vincent Residents Group
http://www.informedeastvincentresidents.blogspot.com/
informedeastvincentresidents@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)